Recovery from vaginal hysterectomy compared with laparoscopy‐assisted vaginal hysterectomy:
article
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate short‐term recovery of vaginal hysterectomy with those of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy performed in a prospective, randomized multicentric study. Study design. Eighty patients referred for hysterectomy for benign pathology were randomized to either vaginal hysterectomy (40 patients) or laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (40 patients). Inclusion criteria were uterine size larger than 280 g and one or more of the following: previous pelvic surgery, history of pelvic inflammatory disease, moderate or severe endometriosis, concomitant adnexal masses, and indication for adnexectomy. No upper limit of uterine size was set. All the laparoscopic and the vaginal hysterectomies were done under endotracheal general anesthesia. Results. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of patient’s age, parity, postmenopausal state, indication for surgery and mean uterine weight between the 2 groups. Laparoconversion was performed in three women in the laparoscopic group. Operative time was significantly shorter in the vaginal versus the laparoscopic groups 108±35 and 160±50 respectively ( p <0.001). The use of paracetamol, non steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, and opioid during hospitalization were similar in the 2 groups. There was no difference in the 1st day hemoglobin level drop, time of passing gas and stool, or hospital stay between the 2 groups. Conclusion. In contrast with earlier reports, there was no difference in short‐term recovery between patients undergoing vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy. No advantage was found performing laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy in comparison with the standard vaginal hysterectomy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (19)
- Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐ophorectomy with conventional abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐ophorectomy via openalex
- Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States via openalex
- Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study via openalex
- W2012909860 via openalex
- W2017952546 via openalex
- W2036230960 via openalex
- W2041674509 via openalex
- W2049446992 via openalex
- W2070080301 via openalex
- W1986242931 via openalex
- W2092321358 via openalex
- W2100670602 via openalex
- W2144738065 via openalex
- W2155873935 via openalex
- W2478511312 via openalex
- W2518738150 via openalex
- W3023490311 via openalex
- W6649606230 via openalex
- W6659317012 via openalex
Cited by (5)
- Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Large Uteri weighing more than 500 grams at a Single Institution 2014
- Predicting the success of vaginal surgery: a quantitative risk assessment model for future investigation 2013
- Total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy 2011
- Postoperative pain after laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a randomized trial 2010
- Hysterectomy and women’s health 2003
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK