Three‐Dimensional Sonography for Diagnosis of Rectovaginal Septum Endometriosis
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 12 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
Introital 3D sonography demonstrated very good interobserver agreement for diagnosing deep endometriosis of the rectovaginal septum in 83 patients.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver agreement for diagnosis of deep endometriosis of the rectovaginal septum using introital 3-dimensional (3D) sonography. METHODS: Two experienced observers (observers A and B) performed a retrospective review of stored 3D sonographic volumes from a sample of 84 consecutive patients with a clinical suspicion of endometriosis. Each observer, independently and blinded to each other, evaluated the presence or absence of involvement of the rectovaginal septum. When no lesion was seen, the observers were asked to judge whether the acquisition of the volume was suboptimal for interpretation or whether no lesion on the rectovaginal septum was detectable. One inadequate acquisition case was discarded; a total of 83 cases were evaluated. To calculate the performance of introital 3D sonography, 7 discordant cases were reviewed by a third observer. Interobserver agreement was assessed by calculating the κ index, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the 3 observers were also determined. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was 0.816 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.93), representing very good agreement. Sensitivity was 74.1%; specificity, 85.7%; positive predictive value, 71.4%; and negative predictive value, 87.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that introital 3D sonography for diagnosis of deep endometriosis of the rectovaginal septum is reproducible, with very good interobserver agreement.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (26)
- Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography in the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis via openalex
- Diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal 3D ultrasonography via openalex
- Diagnosis of endometriosis of the rectovaginal septum using introital three-dimensional ultrasonography via openalex
- Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for deep pelvic endometriosis via openalex
- Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for non‐invasive diagnosis of bowel endometriosis: systematic review and meta‐analysis via openalex
- Diagnostic value of transvaginal 'tenderness-guided' ultrasonography for the prediction of location of deep endometriosis via openalex
- Does transvaginal ultrasonography combined with water-contrast in the rectum aid in the diagnosis of rectovaginal endometriosis infiltrating the bowel? via openalex
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Endometriosis: Deeply Infiltrating Endometriosis Does Not Originate from the Rectovaginal Septum via openalex
- Preoperative work-up for patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis: transvaginal ultrasonography must definitely be the first-line imaging examination via openalex
- Rectosigmoid endometriosis. Diagnosis using endovaginal sonography. via openalex
- Sonovaginography is a new technique for assessing rectovaginal endometriosis via openalex
- “Tenderness-guided” transvaginal ultrasonography: a new method for the detection of deep endometriosis in patients with chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- W2188454615 via openalex
- W2291960606 via openalex
- W2134618546 via openalex
- W1966088767 via openalex
- W2018234093 via openalex
- W2037789405 via openalex
- W2100103332 via openalex
- W2122570897 via openalex
- W1965337881 via openalex
- W2136748184 via openalex
- W2145581164 via openalex
- W2153607635 via openalex
- W2164777277 via openalex
- W2170519509 via openalex
Cited by (12)
- Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Endometriosis 2026
- Comparison and correlations between findings of hysteroscopy and vaginal color Doppler ultrasonography for detection of uterine abnormalities in patients with recurrent implantation failure 2025
- Non-enhanced Transvaginal Ultrasonography 2020
- Sonographic Differential Diagnosis in Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: The Bowel 2019
- Forniceal-Vaginal Deep Endometriosis 2018
- Uterosacral Ligament Endometriosis 2018
- Performances et place de l’échographie dans le diagnostic de l’endométriose, RPC Endométriose CNGOF–HAS 2018
- Diagnosis of deep endometriosis: clinical examination, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other techniques 2017
- Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: Comparison Between 2‐Dimensional Ultrasonography (US), 3‐Dimensional US, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2017
- Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis 2016
- Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group 2016
- 10.1016/s0246-1064(20)82932-6 2000
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-19T06:14:56.452680+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:59.468224+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK