Predicting Endometriosis Status and Menstrual Cycle Phase Using DNA Methylation

preprint OA: green CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-10 · read from full text

This study developed a machine learning pipeline to classify endometriosis status and menstrual cycle phase using genome-wide DNA methylation data from 984 eutopic endometrial tissue samples. Ridge logistic regression models achieved high accuracy in predicting menstrual cycle phases, while demonstrating moderate but meaningful performance in distinguishing endometriosis cases from controls. The researchers noted that the predictive signal for endometriosis was diffuse across many loci rather than concentrated in specific CpG sites, with pathway enrichment analyses showing strong results for cycle phase but limited significance for disease status after correction. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically investigating whether DNA methylation patterns in eutopic endometrium can serve as biomarkers for disease detection and classification.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with pelvic pain, infertility, and delayed diagnosis. Growing evidence suggests that altered DNA methylation contributes to disease development and could serve as a biomarker for disease. We developed a leakage-safe machine learning pipeline to classify endometriosis case-control status and menstrual cycle phase using genome-wide DNA methylation data from eutopic endometrial tissue. The dataset consisted of 984 samples profiled using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC array, with measurements across approximately 759,000 CpG sites. Technical variation was corrected using SmartSVA batch correction. Ridge logistic regression models were trained using stratified 80/20 train-test splits, with regularization strength selected via stratified cross-validation. Feature selection approaches included ridge coefficient ranking, per-CpG t-tests, and univariate logistic regression with FDR correction. Model validity was evaluated using label-shuffling analyses. Menstrual cycle phase classification showed strong performance (mean cross-validation AUROC: 0.971, held-out test AUROC: 0.989), reflecting genome-wide hormonally driven methylation. Ridge regression produced lower but meaningful performance for endometriosis classification (mean cross-validation AUROC: 0.854, held-out test AUROC: 0.875). Ridge coefficient-based feature selection identified compact predictive CpG sets, supporting the hypothesis that endometriosis-associated methylation signal is distributed across many loci rather than a few highly predictive CpGs. Pathway enrichment analyses identified substantial enrichment for menstrual cycle phase but limited enrichment for disease status following FDR correction, consistent with a diffuse endometriosis-associated signal. These findings demonstrate that ridge regression can detect methylation patterns associated with both endometriosis and menstrual cycle phase, highlighting the importance of accounting for cycle-related epigenetic variation in endometrial DNA methylation studies.
Full text 2,181 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with pelvic pain, infertility, and delayed diagnosis. Growing evidence suggests that altered DNA methylation contributes to disease development and could serve as a biomarker for disease. We developed a leakage-safe machine learning pipeline to classify endometriosis case-control status and menstrual cycle phase using genome-wide DNA methylation data from eutopic endometrial tissue. The dataset consisted of 984 samples profiled using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC array, with measurements across approximately 759,000 CpG sites. Technical variation was corrected using SmartSVA batch correction. Ridge logistic regression models were trained using stratified 80/20 train-test splits, with regularization strength selected via stratified cross-validation. Feature selection approaches included ridge coefficient ranking, per-CpG t-tests, and univariate logistic regression with FDR correction. Model validity was evaluated using label-shuffling analyses. Menstrual cycle phase classification showed strong performance (mean cross-validation AUROC: 0.971, held-out test AUROC: 0.989), reflecting genome-wide hormonally driven methylation. Ridge regression produced lower but meaningful performance for endometriosis classification (mean cross-validation AUROC: 0.854, held-out test AUROC: 0.875). Ridge coefficient-based feature selection identified compact predictive CpG sets, supporting the hypothesis that endometriosis-associated methylation signal is distributed across many loci rather than a few highly predictive CpGs. Pathway enrichment analyses identified substantial enrichment for menstrual cycle phase but limited enrichment for disease status following FDR correction, consistent with a diffuse endometriosis-associated signal. These findings demonstrate that ridge regression can detect methylation patterns associated with both endometriosis and menstrual cycle phase, highlighting the importance of accounting for cycle-related epigenetic variation in endometrial DNA methylation studies. Graphical Abstract Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-10T06:34:43.051846+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-09-10T06:07:16.079658+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-09T06:31:01.691765+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0