Pros and Cons of “Add-back” Therapy

David B. Redwine, D B Redwine
Fertility and Sterility · 1994 · vol. 61(2) , pp. 404–406 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56544-3 · PMID:8299809 · W2418208971
letter OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12 ⓘ

This paper reviews the benefits and drawbacks of using "add-back" therapy in various clinical contexts.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_pain

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pelvic Pain Endometriosis Female Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Humans Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (6)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:22:48.782012+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:29.222973+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-15T06:18:04.506796+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK