Abstract
Abdominal wall endometriosis is an uncommon clinical entity. The localization of the disease in the
muscles of the abdominal wall is considered extremely rare. Our patient with two cesarean sections in her
obstetric history presented to the gynecology outpatient clinic of the General Hospital of Trikala, Trikala,
Greece, complaining of intense pain, particularly during menstruation, though no palpable lesions were
found in the abdominal wall. The pelvic imaging revealed no abnormalities. Based on the clinical findings,
endometriosis of the abdominal wall was suspected. Surgical excision of a flat lesion from the abdominal
wall muscles, followed by histological examination of the surgical specimen, confirmed endometriosis of the
rectus abdominis muscle. The patient's postoperative course was smooth. Six months after surgery, without
additional hormonal suppressive medication, the patient reported complete relief of symptoms. To date, she
is regularly followed up at the Gynecology outpatient clinic. The remarkable feature of this case is the
surgical treatment of endometriosis in the rectus abdominis muscles, based on the typical clinical findings
of the disease. The case emphasizes the rarity of endometriosis in the rectus abdominis muscle, the
significant challenges in preoperative diagnosis, and the crucial role of recognizing typical clinical features
for early diagnosis and effective treatment of abdominal wall endometriosis.
Categories:
Obstetrics/Gynecology, Oncology
Keywords
abdominal wall, case report, endometriosis, histological examination, rectus abdominis muscles, surgical
treatment, symptoms
Introduction
Endometriosis is a hormone-dependent, chronic, inflammatory, and complex condition characterized by the
growth and proliferation of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity. It is a common yet frequently
underdiagnosed condition, causing considerable morbidity from puberty through postmenopause
[1]
. The
incidence of endometriosis is estimated to affect up to 10% of women of reproductive age worldwide
[2]
.
Despite the increasing prevalence of the disease and the great interest of the scientific community in these
patients in recent years, the pathogenetic mechanisms of endometriosis remain inadequately understood
[3]
. Endometriosis is typically located on the outer walls of the uterus, the ovaries, the pelvic peritoneum,
and the uterosacral ligaments (intrapelvic endometriosis). In rare cases, the disease may extend throughout
the peritoneal cavity up to the diaphragm (extrapelvic endometriosis)
[4,5]
. Extrapelvic localization of the
disease in the gastrointestinal tract is most common in the large intestine and significantly less common in
the small intestine
[6]
. Other uncommon extrapelvic sites include the urinary tract, nervous system,
perineum, umbilicus, and abdominal wall
[7-10]
.
Abdominal wall endometriosis is estimated to represent 0.03%-2% of extrapelvic forms of the disease
[11]
. It
most commonly occurs following obstetric or gynecologic surgery involving laparotomy or laparoscopy
[12]
.
Localization within the rectus abdominis muscles (our case) is considered extremely rare
[13]
. Endometriosis
in the abdominal wall muscles was first described by Amato and Levitt in 1984
[14]
. The prevalence of rectus
abdominis muscle endometriosis, particularly when associated with cesarean section, is reported to range
from 0.03% to 0.45%
[15]
. It is estimated that approximately 25% of these patients have a history of pelvic
endometriosis. Symptom onset usually occurs within three months to 10 years after surgery
[15]
. Our patient
had two cesarean sections in her obstetric history. Our patient, who had undergone two cesarean sections,
experienced symptom onset of endometriotic foci in the rectus abdominis muscles nine years after her last
cesarean section. Notably, there was no history or imaging evidence of pelvic endometriosis in this case.
A distinctive aspect of this case was the decision to proceed with surgical treatment based on clinical
diagnosis despite negative pelvic imaging and the rarity of endometriosis in the rectus abdominis. This
1
1
2
3
3
3
Open Access Case Report
How to cite this article
Thanasa E, Thanasa A, Kamaretsos E, et al. (November 18, 2024) Surgical Treatment of a Rare Case of Extrapelvic Endometriosis in the Rectus
Abdominis Muscles With Negative Imaging Findings: A Case Report and Mini Literature Review. Cureus 16(11): e73891.
DOI
10.7759/cureus.73891
underscores the considerable diagnostic challenges presented by such cases and highlights the importance of
recognizing typical clinical features of abdominal wall endometriosis, which can lead to timely and accurate
preoperative diagnosis and intervention.
Case Presentation
A 34-year-old reproductive patient with two cesarean sections in her obstetric history presented to the
gynecology outpatient clinic of the General Hospital of Trikala, Trikala, Greece, complaining of lower
abdominal pain along the Pfannenstiel incision. Her most recent cesarean section was performed 10 years
ago, and the onset of the pain was approximately nine years following this surgery. The pain was continuous
and had progressively intensified over the past few months, with the patient reporting that it became even
more severe during menstruation. On abdominal examination, no palpable mass was detected in the
abdominal wall. The patient reported increased tenderness on deep palpation along the surgical site,
particularly near its right end. Ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging of the
abdomen revealed no abnormal findings from the abdominal wall or pelvic organs. Inflammation markers
and tumor markers were within normal ranges (Table
1
).
Laboratory tests
Preoperative values
Normal laboratory values
WBC
5.68 x 40
3
/mL
4-10.8 x 10
3
/mL
NEUT
62.9%
40%-75%
CRP
0.1 mg/dL
0.5 mg/dL
CEA
2.75 ng/mL
<5 ng/mL
CA125
17.1 U/mL
≤35 U/mL
CA15-3
18.7 U/mL
0.0-31.3 U/mL
CA15-9
14.9 U/mL
0.0-37 U/mL
TABLE
1: Inflammatory markers and cancer markers during the patient's preoperative checkup
WBC: white blood cells; NEUT: neutrophils; CRP: C reactive protein; CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; CA125: cancer antigen 125; CA15-3: cancer antigen
15-3; CA15-9: cancer antigen 19-9
The patient had a medical history of well-regulated hypothyroidism, for which she was receiving appropriate
medication. Her body mass index (BMI) was within the normal range (BMI = 23).
Despite the negative pelvic imaging, abdominal wall endometriosis was strongly suspected based on the
patient's medical history and clinical findings. A decision was made to surgically investigate the abdominal
wall, particularly around the previous surgical sites. No damage to the subcutaneous tissue was observed.
However, after dissection and opening of the fascia, a flat mass was identified at the level of the rectus
abdominis muscles, located near the pubic symphysis, particularly on the right side. The mass was found to
infiltrate the muscle wall (Figure
1
).
2024 Thanasa et al. Cureus 16(11): e73891. DOI 10.7759/cureus.73891
2
of
7
FIGURE
1: Intraoperative image of rectus abdominis endometriosis. The
flat form of the disease is evident bilaterally within the rectus abdominis
muscles and especially on the right side (yellow arrows)
Wide segmental excision of the lesion was performed, and macroscopic examination revealed sections of
fibroadipose and striated muscle tissue with foci of endometriosis (Figure
2
).
2024 Thanasa et al. Cureus 16(11): e73891. DOI 10.7759/cureus.73891
3
of
7
FIGURE
2: Surgical specimen of rectal abdominal muscle
endometriosis. Sections of fibroadipose and striated muscle tissue
excised from the rectus abdominis muscles are shown
Microscopic examination of the surgical specimen detected the presence of dilated endometrial glands and
endometrial stroma, which confirmed the diagnosis of endometriosis of the rectus abdominis muscles
(Figure
3
).
2024 Thanasa et al. Cureus 16(11): e73891. DOI 10.7759/cureus.73891
4
of
7
FIGURE
3: Histological image of rectal abdominal muscle
endometriosis. The presence of dilated endometrial glands and
endometrial stroma with hemorrhagic infiltration is clearly depicted
(hematoxylin and eosin stain; magnification 10×)
After evaluating the abdominal wall, the surgical team determined that mesh placement was necessary. Our
patient was discharged on the second postoperative day. No additional hormonal suppressive therapy was
recommended, as it was considered that complete resection of the endometriotic lesion had been achieved.
Six months after surgery, our patient reported full relief of preoperative symptoms. To date, she has been
under regular follow-up (every six months) at the gynecology outpatient clinic.
Discussion
Diagnosing endometriosis of the rectus abdominis muscles preoperatively is challenging. However, the
presence of a localized, palpable mass near the surgical site of prior obstetric or gynecological surgery
involving the uterine cavity is a significant risk factor for abdominal wall endometriosis. A key clinical
indicator of anterior abdominal wall endometriosis is cyclic pain that intensifies progressively during
menstruation
[16]
. In some cases, however, this typical cyclic pain may be absent, and the diagnosis may only
occur incidentally during surgery for another condition or may present as mild tenderness on palpation of
the suprapubic area along the surgical site
[17]
. In exceptionally rare cases, the pain may be acute and
extremely severe due to the formation of an endometrioma at the rectus abdominis muscles
[18]
. In our
patient, the history of previous cesarean sections, combined with the typical persistent and intense cyclic
pain localized to the surgical site, strongly indicated the likelihood of abdominal wall endometriosis. Despite
the absence of imaging findings of endometriosis in the abdominal wall and pelvis, surgical treatment of the
patient was decided based exclusively on the typical clinical features of the disease.
While the diagnostic value of typical clinical features in abdominal wall endometriosis is well established,
modern imaging modalities, such as ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging,
play a crucial role in achieving early and accurate preoperative diagnoses. Transabdominal and Doppler
ultrasound imaging techniques of the abdominal wall are particularly valuable for detecting endometriosis
in the rectus abdominis muscles. Ultrasound findings can vary widely, presenting as a solid, cystic, or mixed
mass with solid and cystic components, which may appear hypoechoic or hyperechoic and often display high
vascularity on Doppler imaging
[18,19]
. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging provide
valuable diagnostic information, especially for detecting small, flat masses, by identifying the precise
location and delineating the size of the lesion in the abdominal wall. At the same time, it is considered that
they can significantly assist in making decisions for the appropriate planning of an early therapeutic
approach to the disease
[16]
. However, in our patient, transabdominal ultrasound, computed tomography,
and magnetic resonance imaging could not reveal findings on the abdominal wall indicative of
endometriotic lesions and establish the diagnosis of endometriosis in the rectus abdominis muscle. Most
likely, this is attributed to the presence of flat and diffuse lesions within the abdominal muscle wall.
2024 Thanasa et al. Cureus 16(11): e73891. DOI 10.7759/cureus.73891
5
of
7
Consequently, the diagnosis and the decision to surgically investigate the disease were based exclusively on
the clinical findings.
Surgical treatment remains the primary treatment option, especially for large extrapelvic endometriomas
and for nonpalpable or intermittently palpable lesions in the abdominal wall
[20]
. Wide local excision of the
lesion with clear margins (5-10 mm of surrounding normal tissue) is the treatment of choice, ensuring the
histological diagnosis of endometriosis of the rectus abdominis muscle and minimizing recurrence risk.
Surgical excision of the lesion should be performed with great care to prevent tissue damage and potential
reimplantation of microscopic remnants of endometriosis disease in the adjacent tissues
[21]
. In cases of
large endometriomas or extensive flat endometriotic lesions, the resection of which results in a significant
deficit in the rectus abdominis muscles, mesh placement is necessary. Mesh placement is especially
beneficial for replenishing the tissue loss caused by resection of the endometriotic mass
[12,13]
. In our
patient, a team of specialized surgeons positioned mesh at the level of the rectus abdominis muscles to
reinforce the area. Additionally, thorough irrigation of the surgical wound with normal saline at the end of
the procedure and changing surgical gloves before suturing the abdominal wall are considered good surgical
practices. These measures, although not conclusively proven, may help reduce the risk of abdominal wall
endometriosis recurrence
[11]
.
Hormonal suppressive therapy can help manage symptoms and delay the progression of endometriosis in
symptomatic patients who do not wish to achieve pregnancy immediately. The first-line treatment typically
includes combined oral contraceptives and progestogens. If these fail to provide adequate symptom control,
second-line options such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists may be considered
[22]
. Pharmacological therapy, not combined with surgery, is thought to provide temporary relief from
symptoms but is not able to effectively address the underlying disease. Additionally, studies indicate a
significant risk of recurrence following the discontinuation of medication
[23]
. Postoperative hormonal
suppressive therapy may be beneficial for patients where there is suspicion of incomplete excision of an
endometriotic mass from the abdominal wall on nonclear margins, as it can help reduce the risk of
recurrence in cases
[16,24]
. In our patient, no additional hormonal suppressive therapy was recommended
postoperatively, as it was considered that complete excision of the endometriotic foci from the rectus
abdominis muscles was performed.
The prognosis of rectus abdominis endometriosis is generally favorable, with a recurrence rate of up to
4.3%. Malignant transformation is rare (0.3%-1%)
[24]
. In patients where there is a strong suspicion of
malignant transformation of the endometriotic lesion, the therapeutic approach should prioritize prompt
surgical intervention, potentially followed by adjuvant therapy as appropriate
[25]
.
Conclusions
Abdominal wall endometriosis located in the rectus abdominis muscles is an extremely rare nosological
entity. In symptomatic patients with relevant risk factors and typical clinical signs of the disease, negative
pelvic imaging should not rule out the possibility of abdominal wall endometriosis. Misinterpretation or
underestimation of clinical symptoms may delay accurate preoperative diagnosis and the timely application
of effective treatment, potentially impacting patient quality of life and leading to disease progression.
Additional Information
Author Contributions
All authors have reviewed the final version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the
work.
Concept and design:
Ioannis Thanasas
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:
Ioannis Thanasas, Efthymia Thanasa, Anna Thanasa,
Evangelos Kamaretsos, Gerasimos Kontogeorgis, Ioannis Paraoulakis
Drafting of the manuscript:
Ioannis Thanasas, Efthymia Thanasa, Anna Thanasa, Evangelos Kamaretsos,
Gerasimos Kontogeorgis, Ioannis Paraoulakis
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:
Ioannis Thanasas
Supervision:
Ioannis Thanasas
Disclosures
Human subjects:
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
In
compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services
info:
All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the
submitted work.
Financial relationships:
All authors have declared that they have no financial
2024 Thanasa et al. Cureus 16(11): e73891. DOI 10.7759/cureus.73891
6
of
7
relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an
interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships:
All authors have declared that there are no other
relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
References
1
.
Crump J, Suker A, White L:
Endometriosis: a review of recent evidence and guidelines
. Aust J Gen Pract.
2024, 53:11-8.
10.31128/AJGP/04-23-6805
2
.
Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Chiappa V, Ceccaroni M, et al.:
Epidemiology of infertility in women with
endometriosis
. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2024, 92:102454.
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102454
3
.
Adilbayeva A, Kunz J:
Pathogenesis of endometriosis and endometriosis-associated cancers
. Int J Mol Sci.
2024, 25:7624.
10.3390/ijms25147624
4
.
Kaveh M, Tahermanesh K, Mehdizadeh Kashi A, Tajbakhsh B, Mansouri GH, Sadegi K:
Endometriosis of
diaphragm: a case report
. Int J Fertil Steril. 2018, 12:263-6.
10.22074/ijfs.2018.5379
5
.
Taylor HS, Kotlyar AM, Flores VA:
Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: clinical challenges and
novel innovations
. Lancet. 2021, 397:839-52.
10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00389-5
6
.
Sakiris A, Fraz EN, Rajandran A, et al.:
Rare presentations of small bowel endometriosis
. DEN Open. 2025,
5:e395.
10.1002/deo2.395
7
.
Tian Y, Pei K, Bai J, Wang P:
Primary perineal endometriosis - a case report and literature review
. Ceska
Gynekol. 2024, 89:40-3.
10.48095/cccg202440
8
.
Raj FA, Padmakumar D, Selvam P, Ajmal IT:
Primary extrapelvic umbilical endometriosis presenting with
cyclical umbilical bleeding: a case report
. Cureus. 2024, 16:e65473.
10.7759/cureus.65473
9
.
Thanasa A, Thanasa E, Antoniou IR, et al.:
Abdominal wall endometriosis: early diagnosis of a rare
iatrogenic complication following cesarean section
. Cureus. 2024, 16:e56284.
10.7759/cureus.56284
10
.
Thanasa A, Thanasa E, Kamaretsos E, Gerokostas EE, Thanasas I:
Extrapelvic endometriosis located
individually in the rectus abdominis muscle: a rare cause of chronic pelvic pain (a case report)
. Pan Afr Med
J. 2022, 42:242.
10.11604/pamj.2022.42.242.36325
11
.
Audebert A:
Iatrogenic endometriosis during reproductive age: main issues? [Article in French]
. Gynecol
Obstet Fertil. 2013, 41:322-7.
10.1016/j.gyobfe.2012.06.001
12
.
Slaiki S, Jamor J:
Endometriosis of the rectus abdominis muscles: a rare case of dual location
. J Surg Case
Rep. 2020, 2020:rjaa360.
10.1093/jscr/rjaa360
13
.
Toullalan O, Baqué P, Benchimol D, et al.:
Endometriosis of the rectus abdominis muscles
. Ann Chir. 2000,
125:880-3.
10.1016/s0003-3944(00)00014-6
14
.
Amato M, Levitt R:
Abdominal wall endometrioma: CT findings
. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984, 8:1213-4.
10.1097/00004728-198412000-00040
15
.
Dordević M, Jovanović B, Mitrović S, Dordević G, Radovanović D, Sazdanović P:
Rectus abdominis muscle
endometriosis after cesarean section--case report
. Acta Clin Croat. 2009, 48:439-43.
16
.
Evruke IM, Babaturk A, Akbas G:
A rare occurrence of endometriosis externa individually within the rectus
abdominis muscle
. Cureus. 2023, 15:e33662.
10.7759/cureus.33662
17
.
Granese R, Cucinella G, Barresi V, Navarra G, Candiani M, Triolo O:
Isolated endometriosis on the rectus
abdominis muscle in women without a history of abdominal surgery: a rare and intriguing finding
. J Minim
Invasive Gynecol. 2009, 16:798-801.
10.1016/j.jmig.2009.08.005
18
.
Roberge RJ, Kantor WJ, Scorza L:
Rectus abdominis endometrioma
. Am J Emerg Med. 1999, 17:675-7.
10.1016/s0735-6757(99)90157-2
19
.
Karaman H, Bulut F, Özaşlamacı A:
Endometriosis externa within the rectus abdominis muscle
. Ulus Cerrahi
Derg. 2014, 30:165-8.
10.5152/UCD.2014.2035
20
.
Raman AG, John V, Huynh J, McCloud A Jr, Barrows BD, Hubeny C, Salehpour MM:
Savi Scout localization
for extrapelvic endometriosis resection
. Am J Case Rep. 2024, 25:e942581.
10.12659/AJCR.942581
21
.
Triantafyllidou O, Mili N, Kalampokas T, Vlahos N, Kalampokas E:
Surgical management of abdominal wall
sheath and rectus abdominis muscle endometriosis: a case report and literature review
. Front Surg. 2023,
10:1335931.
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1335931
22
.
Alonso A, Gunther K, Maheux-Lacroix S, Abbott J:
Medical management of endometriosis
. Curr Opin Obstet
Gynecol. 2024, 36:353-61.
10.1097/GCO.0000000000000983
23
.
Rindos NB, Mansuria S:
Diagnosis and management of abdominal wall endometriosis: a systematic review
and clinical recommendations
. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017, 72:116-22.
10.1097/OGX.0000000000000399
24
.
Wasserman P, Kurra C, Taylor K, Wells B, Sharma A, Leon A:
Catamenial rectus abdominis pain associated
with scar endometriosis status-post low transverse cesarean section
. Cureus. 2018, 10:e3778.
10.7759/cureus.3778
25
.
Deng P, Weng C, Xu J, Nie H:
Endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from abdominal wall endometriosis: a
case report and literature review
. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024, 50:1420-4.
10.1111/jog.16000
2024 Thanasa et al. Cureus 16(11): e73891. DOI 10.7759/cureus.73891
7
of
7
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.