A prospective, randomized trial comparing two different intrauterine insemination regimens in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles
RCT
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This randomized trial compared two intrauterine insemination regimens during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and reported their comparative efficacy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare a single periovulatory intrauterine insemination (IUI) with a regimen employing two IUIs, one before ovulation and one after ovulation, in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG) combined with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG).
DESIGN: A randomized, prospective trial.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one consecutive patients undergoing 49 cycles of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation/IUI were studied in a tertiary care setting.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ovulation was determined sonographically. The establishment of a clinical pregnancy was defined by either ultrasonographic verification of cardiac activity within an intrauterine fetus, or histologic confirmation of trophoblast in a surgical specimen.
RESULTS: Clinical pregnancies developed in 2 of 23 cycles in the single insemination group, compared with 12 of the 23 cycles in the double insemination group. Cycle fecundity was significantly higher for group II (0.522) than for group I (0.087) patients (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: In hMG/hCG cycles, two IUIs timed as described above are superior to one periovulatory insemination.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
References (17)
- Intrauterine insemination and ovulation stimulation as treatment of infertility via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59825-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53351-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54488-4 via openalex
- W2410593106 via openalex
- W2438912389 via openalex
- W6712571445 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/00324728.1969.10405297 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137012 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48969-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47601-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54168-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136822 via openalex
- doi:10.1055/s-2007-1021849 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48750-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59414-x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(86)90258-9 via openalex
Cited by (5)
- Comparison of single versus double intrauterine insemination 2008
- Diagnosis and treatment of unexplained infertility 2008
- Subfertility: causes, treatment and outcome 2003
- A comparison of clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotropin for use in conjunction with intrauterine insemination 1997
- Does increasing frequency of intrauterine insemination improve pregnancy rates significantly during superovulation cycles? 1994
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:16:54.145842+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:04:17.981133+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-17T06:32:46.214484+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK