A prospective, randomized trial comparing two different intrauterine insemination regimens in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles
RCT
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This randomized trial compared two intrauterine insemination regimens during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and reported their comparative efficacy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare a single periovulatory intrauterine insemination (IUI) with a regimen employing two IUIs, one before ovulation and one after ovulation, in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG) combined with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG).
DESIGN: A randomized, prospective trial.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one consecutive patients undergoing 49 cycles of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation/IUI were studied in a tertiary care setting.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ovulation was determined sonographically. The establishment of a clinical pregnancy was defined by either ultrasonographic verification of cardiac activity within an intrauterine fetus, or histologic confirmation of trophoblast in a surgical specimen.
RESULTS: Clinical pregnancies developed in 2 of 23 cycles in the single insemination group, compared with 12 of the 23 cycles in the double insemination group. Cycle fecundity was significantly higher for group II (0.522) than for group I (0.087) patients (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: In hMG/hCG cycles, two IUIs timed as described above are superior to one periovulatory insemination.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (17)
- Intrauterine insemination and ovulation stimulation as treatment of infertility via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59825-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53351-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54488-4 via openalex
- W2410593106 via openalex
- W2438912389 via openalex
- W6712571445 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/00324728.1969.10405297 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137012 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48969-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47601-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54168-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136822 via openalex
- doi:10.1055/s-2007-1021849 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48750-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59414-x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(86)90258-9 via openalex
Cited by (5)
- Comparison of single versus double intrauterine insemination 2008
- Diagnosis and treatment of unexplained infertility 2008
- Subfertility: causes, treatment and outcome 2003
- A comparison of clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotropin for use in conjunction with intrauterine insemination 1997
- Does increasing frequency of intrauterine insemination improve pregnancy rates significantly during superovulation cycles? 1994
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:16:54.145842+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:04:17.981133+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-17T06:32:46.214484+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK