Use of anal endosonography in diagnosis of endometriosis of the external anal sphincter

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 16 in-corpus citations
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-11 ⓘ

Anal endosonography accurately located an endometriotic lesion in the external anal sphincter, proving essential for diagnosis when other methods were inconclusive.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-14 · read from full text ⓘ

This case report examines a 24-year-old female with perianal endometriosis located in the external anal sphincter, highlighting the diagnostic utility of anal endosonography. The authors utilized preoperative and intraoperative imaging to precisely localize the lesion when standard history, digital examination, and proctoscopy proved inconclusive. They argue that surgical excision is superior to hormonal suppression for this specific presentation to preserve sphincter architecture and obtain necessary histological confirmation to rule out malignancy. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically the diagnosis and surgical management of rare extragenital lesions involving the external anal sphincter.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: Perianal endometriosis is an infrequent form of extragenital endometriosis and is usually situated in episiotomy scars. METHODS: We report a rare case involving the external anal sphincter in a 24 year-old female. The precise anatomical location of the endometriotic lesion was confirmed using preoperative and intraoperative anal endosonography. CONCLUSION: We believe this procedure to be essential when history, digital examination, and proctoscopy are not conclusive in the differential diagnosis of perianal pain or mass. Although hormonal suppression often is the therapy of choice in extrapelvic endometriosis, we think surgical excision, respecting the anatomical fiber architecture of the anal sphincter, is the best treatment for perianal endometriosis. Surgical excision is required for histological diagnosis, which is imperative in view of the albeit rare development of malignancy in extragenital endometriosis.
Full text 1,115 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Methods

We report a rare case involving the external anal sphincter in a 24 year-old female. The precise anatomical location of the endometriotic lesion was confirmed using preoperative and intraoperative anal endosonography.

Conclusion

We believe this procedure to be essential when history, digital examination, and proctoscopy are not conclusive in the differential diagnosis of perianal pain or mass. Although hormonal suppression often is the therapy of choice in extrapelvic endometriosis, we think surgical excision, respecting the anatomical fiber architecture of the anal sphincter, is the best treatment for perianal endometriosis. Surgical excision is required for histological diagnosis, which is imperative in view of the albeit rare development of malignancy in extragenital endometriosis.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Anal Canal Endometriosis Endosonography Adult Anal Canal Anal Canal Anal Canal Diagnosis, Differential Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (14)

Cited by (16)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-25T06:10:54.854274+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:29.640636+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-25T06:33:09.130943+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK