Laparoscopic evaluation of female infertility in low socioeconomic status

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2018 · vol. 7(8) , pp. 3232 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20183323 · W2884699161
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This study evaluated factors for primary and secondary infertility in 50 low socioeconomic status women using laparoscopy, finding tuberculosis and pelvic inflammatory disease to be the most common causes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text

This prospective observational study evaluated factors associated with primary and secondary infertility among 50 reproductive-age women from low socioeconomic status using laparoscopic assessment over a 2-year period at a single obstetrics and gynecology department. The authors reported that tuberculosis was the largest contributor in primary infertility (27.02%), followed by ovarian cysts (16.22%), adhesions (10.81%), polycystic ovaries (10.81%), and pelvic inflammatory disease (10.81%), while secondary infertility was most often associated with pelvic inflammatory disease (23.07%), tuberculosis (15.38%), adhesions (15.38%), and endometriosis (7.69%). A major limitation noted in the framing of this work is its small sample size and single-center design, which may restrict generalizability beyond the study setting. Relevance to endometriosis: endometriosis is identified as a key factor in secondary infertility in this laparoscopic evaluation (7.69%), though the overall study’s main emphasis is infertility causes in low socioeconomic status rather than endometriosis specifically.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Infertility is a multidimensional health issue which is rising dramatically. The common causes include ovarian, uterine, tubal disorders, hormonal imbalance, age-related factors and lifestyle factors. The low economic strata poses a subset of problems like difficulty in seeking healthcare, treatment costs and poor compliance. Authors sought to evaluate the factors for primary and secondary infertility in women of reproductive age group who belong to low socio-economic strata using laparoscopy.Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the obstetrics and gynaecology department at Sanjay Gandhi memorial hospital, Delhi comprising 50 infertile women of reproductive age group belonging to low socioeconomic class for a period of 2 years from June 2015 onwards.Results: Among primary infertility, tuberculosis (27.02%), ovarian cyst (16.22%), adhesions (10.81%), polycystic ovaries (10.81%) and Pelvic inflammatory disease (10.81%) were the major findings whereas in secondary infertility Pelvic inflammatory disease (23.07%), tuberculosis (15.38%), adhesions (15.38%) and endometriosis (7.69%) were the major factors seen in the study.Conclusions: Tuberculosis and pelvic inflammatory disease were the major factors seen in infertile women of low socioeconomic status thus, they should be kept high on the list of differential diagnosis even if the investigative work up is negative.
Full text 6,938 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

Infertility is a multidimensional health issue which is rising dramatically. The common causes include ovarian, uterine, tubal disorders, hormonal imbalance, age-related factors and lifestyle factors. The low economic strata poses a subset of problems like difficulty in seeking healthcare, treatment costs and poor compliance. Authors sought to evaluate the factors for primary and secondary infertility in women of reproductive age group who belong to low socio-economic strata using laparoscopy.

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted in the obstetrics and gynaecology department at Sanjay Gandhi memorial hospital, Delhi comprising 50 infertile women of reproductive age group belonging to low socioeconomic class for a period of 2 years from June 2015 onwards.

Results

Among primary infertility, tuberculosis (27.02%), ovarian cyst (16.22%), adhesions (10.81%), polycystic ovaries (10.81%) and Pelvic inflammatory disease (10.81%) were the major findings whereas in secondary infertility Pelvic inflammatory disease (23.07%), tuberculosis (15.38%), adhesions (15.38%) and endometriosis (7.69%) were the major factors seen in the study.

Conclusions

Tuberculosis and pelvic inflammatory disease were the major factors seen in infertile women of low socioeconomic status thus, they should be kept high on the list of differential diagnosis even if the investigative work up is negative. Metrics

References

Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: Potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22:1506-12. Gurunath S, Pandian Z, Anderson RA, Bhattacharya S. Defining infertility: a systematic review of prevalence studies. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17(5):575-88. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology; World Health Organization. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1520-4. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1506-12. Dutta S, Guha R. A clinico-anatomical study on the common etiological factors pertaining to primary infertility in females using some common investigative procedures. J Anat Soc India. 2007;56(2):14-7. Jose Miller AB, Boyden JW, Frey KA. Infertility. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75:849-56. Rehana R, Majid SS. Aetiological factors of infertility. J Postgrad Med Inst. 2004;18:166-71. Winfield AC, Fleischer AC, Moore DE. Diagnostic imaging of fertility disorders. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 1990;19(1):1-38. Ali S, Sophie R, Imam AM, Khan FI, Ali SF, Shaikh A, et al. Knowledge, perceptions and myths regarding infertility among selected adult population in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):760. Callahan LT, Caughey AB. Infertility and assisted reproductive technologies: Blueprints Obstetrics and Gynecology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008;275-89. Rowe PJ, Comhaire FH, Hargreave TB, Mahmoud AMA. WHO manual for the standardized investigation of the infertile couple. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press Cambridge;1993. Glatstein IZ, Harlow BL, Hornstein MD. Practice patterns among reproductive endocrinologists: the infertility evaluation. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:443-51. Marcus E. Setchell. Pre-operative Assessment and Diagnostic Procedures. In: Marcus E. Setchell, John H. Shepherd, editors 7th edition. Shaw’s Textbook of Operative Gynaecology. 2013;34-6. Sudha G. Reddy KSN. Causes of female infertility: a cross-sectional study. Int J Latest Res Sci Technol. 2013;2(6):119-23. Fouany, MR, Muasher SJ. Is there a role for laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of infertility in the 21st century? Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2010;15:146-52. Forman RG, Robinson JN, Mehta Z, Barlow DH. Patient history as a simple predictor of pelvic pathology in subfertile women. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:53-5. Chimote A, Samal S, Hariharan C, Angik R. Laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in patients of infertility in a rural set up. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4:322-8. Kore S, Aparna H, Sudha N, VR Ambiye, PR Vaidya. Sonosalpingography for assessment of tubal patency: Our experience. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2000;50(2):63-6. Nayak PK, Mahapatra PC, Mallick J, Swain S, Mitra S, Sahoo J. Role of diagnostic hysteron-laparoscopy in the evaluation of infertility: a retrospective study of 300 patients. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2013;6(1):32-4. Qurat-ul-Ain W, Ara R, Dangroo SA, Beig M. Diagnostic Laparoscopy in the Evaluation of Female Factors in Infertility in Kashmir Valley. Int J Women’s Health Reprod. 2014;2(2):48-57. Menken J, Trussell J, Larsen U. Age Infert Sci. 1986; 233(4771):1389-94. Templeton A, Morris JK, Parslow W. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilization treatment. Lancet. 1996;348(9039):1402-6. Corson SL, Cheng A, Gutmann JN. Laparoscopy in the normal infertile patient; a question revisited. J Am Gynaecol Laparose. 2000;7(3):317-24. Botting B, Dunnell K. Trends in fertility and contraception in the last quarter of the 20th century. Popul Trends. 2000;(100):32-9. Chakraborti DK, Kole SK. Diagnostic laparoscopy in gynecologic disorders. J Obstet Gynecol India. 1990;40:262-5. Sharma R, Sharma V. The infertile women: a study of 120 cases. J Indian Med Assoc. 1991;89(2):31-2. Naz T, Hassan L, Gulmeen, Nighat F, Sultan S. Laparoscopic evaluation in infertility. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009;19(11):704-7 Kumar P, Malhotra N, (editors). Jeffcoates Principles of Gynaecology. 7th ed., New Delhi. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2008. Jain G, Khatuja R, Juneja A, Mehta S. Laparoscopy: as a first line diagnostic tool for infertility evaluation. J Clin Diag Res. 2014;8(10):1-2. Kausar N, Hussain U, Riaz T, et al. Operative Evaluation of Infertile Females. J F J M C 2010;4(3):17-21. Nousheen Aziz. Laparoscopic Evaluation of Female Factors in Infertility. J Coll Physicians Surgeons Pakistan. 2010;20(10):649-52. Marcoux S, Maheux R, Bérubé S. Laparoscopic surgery in infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis. N Eng J Med. 1997;337(4):217-22. Cahill DJ, Wardle PG. Management of infertility. Br Med J. 2002;325:28-32. Popovic J, Sulovic V, Vucetic D. Laparoscopy treatment of adnexal sterility. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2005;32(1):31-4. Laparoscopy and hysteroscopy - a guide for patients. Alabama; American Society for Reproductive Medicine; 2012.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (27)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK