Cyclic versus continuous medroxyprogesterone acetate for treatment of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia: a 2-year observational study

In: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2015 · vol. 292(6) , pp. 1339–1343 · doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3749-3 · PMID:26015309 · W1886726776
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-07

This study found that cyclic medroxyprogesterone acetate was as effective as continuous MPA for treating endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, but was associated with fewer side effects and greater patient acceptance.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This 2-year prospective observational study enrolled premenopausal women with endometrial hyperplasia (EH) without atypia (n=80), who were randomly assigned to receive either cyclic or continuous medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), with follow-up endometrial sampling at 6 months to assess regression. Regression rates were not significantly different between groups (90% with cyclic MPA vs 82.5% with continuous MPA; p>0.05). Continuous MPA was associated with significantly higher rates of nausea, acne, and menstrual changes (p<0.05), while cyclic MPA was more acceptable to patients. The paper explicitly notes that larger studies are needed to confirm findings, and it includes an Editorial Expression of Concern. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper is centrally about endometrial hyperplasia treatment with MPA rather than endometriosis, and endometriosis is not discussed in the provided text, so it was included in the corpus via a keyword match.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 5,355 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective To assess the efficacy, safety and acceptability of cyclic medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) compared to continuous MPA for treatment of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) without atypia.

Materials and methods

A prospective observational study conducted on premenopausal women with EH without atypia (n = 80) who were randomly assigned into two groups; 40 patients received cyclic 15 mg MPA and 40 patients received continuous 15 mg MPA. Follow-up endometrial sampling was done after 6 months. Primary outcome measure was regression of hyperplasia. Secondary outcome measures include side effects and patient acceptability.

Results

There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding regression of endometrial hyperplasia (90 % in the cyclic MPA group in comparison to 82.5 % in the continuous MPA group with p value >0.05). There was a significant higher women suffering from nausea, acne and menstrual changes in the continuous MPA group (p value <0.05). Cyclic MPA regimen was more acceptable to the patients in comparison to continuous MPA intake.

Conclusions

Cyclic MPA regimen seems a safer and more acceptable therapy in comparison to continuous MPA regimen in patients with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these results. Similar content being viewed by others Change history 08 September 2025 An Editorial Expression of Concern to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08155-8

References

Epplein M, Reed SD, Voigt LF, Newton KM, Holt VL, Weiss NS (2009) Endometrial hyperplasia risk in relation to recent use of oral contraceptives and hormone therapy. Ann Epidemiol 19:1–7 Clark TJ, Neelakantan D, Gupta JK (2006) The management of endometrial hyperplasia: an evaluation of current practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 125:259–264 Epplein M, Reed SD, Voigt LF, Newton KM, Holt VL, Weiss NS (2009) Endometrial hyperplasia risk in relation to recent use of oral contraceptives and hormone therapy. Ann Epidemiol 19:1–7 Hammond R, Johnson J (2004) Endometrial hyperplasia. Curr Obstet Gynaecol 14:99–103 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2005) ACOG practice bulletin, clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists, number 65: management of endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 106:413–425 Buttini MJ, Jordan SJ, Webb PM (2009) The effect of the levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system on endometrial hyperplasia: an Australian study and systematic review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 49(3):316–322 Wang S, Pudney J, Song J, Mor G, Schwartz PE, Zheng W (2003) Mechanisms involved in the evolution of progestin resistance in human endometrial hyperplasia—precursor of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 88:108–117 Vereide AB, Arnes M, Straume B, Maltau JM, Orbo A (2003) Nuclear morphometric changes and therapy monitoring in patients with endometrial hyperplasia: a study comparing effects of intrauterine levonorgestrel and systemic medroxyprogesterone. Gynecol Oncol 91:526–533 Gallos ID, Krishan P, Shehmar M, Ganesan R, Gupta JK (2013) LNG-IUS versus oral progestogen treatment for endometrial hyperplasia: a long-term comparative cohort study. Hum Reprod 28(11):2966–2971 Gunderson CC, Fader AN, Carson KA, Bristow RE (2012) Oncologic and reproductive outcomes with progestin therapy in women with endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 adenocarcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 125:477–482 Ozdegirmenci O, Kayikcioglu F, Bozkurt U, Akgul MA, Haberal A (2011) Comparison of the efficacy of three progestins in the treatment of simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Gynecol Obstet Invest 72(1):10–14 Orbo A, Vereide A, Arnes M, Pettersen I, Straume B (2014) Levonorgestrel-impregnated intrauterine device as treatment for endometrial hyperplasia: a national multicentre randomised trial. BJOG 121(4):477–486 Chaudhry P, Asselin E (2009) Resistance to chemotherapy and hormone therapy in endometrial cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 16(2):363–380 Goncharenko VM, Beniuk VA, Kalenska OV, Demchenko OM, Spivak MY, Bubnov RV (2013) Predictive diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and personalized therapeutic strategy in women of fertile age. EPMA J 4(1):24 Gkrozou F, Dimakopoulos G, Vrekoussis T, Lavasidis L, Koutlas A, Navrozoglou I, Stefos T, Paschopoulos M (2015) Hysteroscopy in women with abnormal uterine bleeding: a meta-analysis on four major endometrial pathologies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(6):1347–1354 Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of the residents and nursing staff of the Gynecology ward and members of Pathology department of Menoufia university Hospital. The author would like to thank all the participants for taking out time to share in this study. I also wish to thank Dr. Mohamed Rezk for his logistic support. Conflict of interest The author reports no declarations of interest. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Emarh, M. Cyclic versus continuous medroxyprogesterone acetate for treatment of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia: a 2-year observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292, 1339–1343 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3749-3 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3749-3

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

Cited by (4)

References (15)

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-14T06:54:16.401154+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-20T06:35:16.286784+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK