Fertility outcome following ovarian stimulation in infertile women having pretreatment with levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus dienogest for symptomatic adenomyosis

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025 · vol. 14(8) , pp. 2439–2447 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252308 · W4412768936
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-14

This study compared fertility outcomes after ovarian stimulation in infertile women with adenomyosis, finding slightly higher ovulation and pregnancy rates with LNG-IUS pre-treatment compared to Dienogest, though not statistically significant.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-14 · read from full text

This quasi-experimental study at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (Dhaka) compared fertility outcomes after ovarian stimulation in infertile women with symptomatic adenomyosis who had been pre-treated with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) versus dienogest, with devices removed/stopping medication before oral ovulogen-based ovarian stimulation aimed at natural conception. Participants had symptomatic relief, and both groups were reported to be comparable in baseline socio-demographics and biochemical/biophysical criteria. Ovulation and pregnancy rates per cycle were higher in the LNG-IUS pre-treatment group than in the dienogest group, but the differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — it evaluates how LNG-IUS versus dienogest pretreatment affects fertility outcomes following ovarian stimulation in women with symptomatic adenomyosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Adenomyosis is an emerging enigmatic uterine disease that negatively impacts women's fertility. Conservative treatments, including medical management, offer hope to preserve future fertility but remain challenging, especially in low-resource settings. Since 2019, at our center, infertile women diagnosed with symptomatic adenomyosis have been pre-treated with either a Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) or Dienogest based on physician preference. Following symptomatic relief, ovarian stimulation protocols were applied to optimize the chances of natural conception without assisted reproductive technologies (ART). This study aimed to compare fertility outcomes following ovarian stimulation in infertile women with symptomatic adenomyosis who had been pre-treated with LNG-IUS versus Dienogest. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, from January 2024 to December 2024. Infertile women with previously diagnosed symptomatic adenomyosis, symptomatically relieved by LNG-IUS or Dienogest, were enrolled. Following enrolment, LNG-IUS devices were removed and Dienogest was discontinued. Participants were divided into two groups: Group A (pre-treated with LNG-IUS) and Group B (pre-treated with Dienogest) and both underwent ovarian stimulation using oral ovulogens. Results: Both groups were comparable in baseline socio demographic, biochemical and biophysical criteria. Ovulation and pregnancy rate in each cycle were higher in LNG-IUS group than Dienogest group though this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Conclusions: Pre-treatment with LNG-IUS prior to ovarian stimulation may offer better fertility outcomes compared to Dienogest, though larger studies involving more cycles and multicenter collaboration are necessary to confirm these findings.
Full text 7,962 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

Adenomyosis is an emerging enigmatic uterine disease that negatively impacts women's fertility. Conservative treatments, including medical management, offer hope to preserve future fertility but remain challenging, especially in low-resource settings. Since 2019, at our center, infertile women diagnosed with symptomatic adenomyosis have been pre-treated with either a Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) or Dienogest based on physician preference. Following symptomatic relief, ovarian stimulation protocols were applied to optimize the chances of natural conception without assisted reproductive technologies (ART). This study aimed to compare fertility outcomes following ovarian stimulation in infertile women with symptomatic adenomyosis who had been pre-treated with LNG-IUS versus Dienogest.

Methods

This quasi-experimental study was conducted at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, from January 2024 to December 2024. Infertile women with previously diagnosed symptomatic adenomyosis, symptomatically relieved by LNG-IUS or Dienogest, were enrolled. Following enrolment, LNG-IUS devices were removed and Dienogest was discontinued. Participants were divided into two groups: Group A (pre-treated with LNG-IUS) and Group B (pre-treated with Dienogest) and both underwent ovarian stimulation using oral ovulogens.

Results

Both groups were comparable in baseline socio demographic, biochemical and biophysical criteria. Ovulation and pregnancy rate in each cycle were higher in LNG-IUS group than Dienogest group though this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05).

Conclusions

Pre-treatment with LNG-IUS prior to ovarian stimulation may offer better fertility outcomes compared to Dienogest, though larger studies involving more cycles and multicenter collaboration are necessary to confirm these findings. Metrics

References

Chen Q, Li YW, Wang S, Fan QB, Shi HH, Leng JH, et al. Clinical manifestations of adenomyosis patients with or without pain symptoms. J Pain Res. 2019;14:3127-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S212117 Liang Z, Yin M, Ma M, Wang Y, Kuang Y. Effect of pretreatment with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on IVF and vitrified–warmed embryo transfer outcomes in women with adenomyosis. Reproductive Bio Med. 2019;39(1):111-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.101 Santulli P, Vannuccini S, Bourdon M, Chapron C, Petraglia F. Adenomyosis: the missed disease. Reproductive Bio Med. 2025;50(4):104837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.104837 Dai Y, Leng J. The Surgical Treatment of Adenomyosis. Adenomyosis: Facts and treatments. 2021:99-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4095-4_11 Puente JM, Fabris A, Patel J, Patel A, Cerrillo M, Requena A, et al. Adenomyosis in infertile women: prevalence and the role of 3D ultrasound as a marker of severity of the disease. Reproduct Bio Endocrinol. 2016;14:1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-016-0185-6 Bourdon M, Oliveira J, Marcellin L, Santulli P, Bordonne C, Maitrot Mantelet L, et al. Adenomyosis of the inner and outer myometrium are associated with different clinical profiles. Human Reprod. 2021;36(2):349-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa307 Wang WJ, Hao CF, Yin GJ, Bao SH, Qiu LH, Lin QD. Increased prevalence of T helper 17 (Th17) cells in peripheral blood and decidua in unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion patients. J Reprod Immunol. 2010;84(2):164-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2009.12.003 Banu J, Sultana S, Alamgir CF. Clinical efficacy of levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus dienogest for women having symptomatic adenomyosis. Scholars International J Obst Gynecol. 2023;6(1):34–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36348/sijog.2023.v06i01.006 Feng M, Chen LH, Hsu LT, Wu HM. Segmented in vitro fertilization and frozen embryo transfer in dienogest-treated patient with adenomyosis: A case report and lierature review. Taiwanese J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;61(5):906-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2021.09.037 Liang T, Zhang W, Pan N, Han B, Li R, Ma C. Reproductive outcomes of in vitro fertilization and fresh embryo transfer in infertile women with adenomyosis: a retrospective cohort study. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:865358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.865358 Schindler AE. Dienogest in long-term treatment of endometriosis. International J Women's Health. 2011;6:175-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S5633 Yang Y, Li J, Chen H, Feng W. Assessment of risk factors associated with severe endometriosis and establishment of preoperative prediction model. Diagnostics. 2022;28;12(10):2348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102348 Akhigbe RE, Afolabi OA, Adegbola CA, Akhigbe TM, Oyedokun PA. Comparison of effectiveness of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and dienogest in the management of adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;2:439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.07.038 Younes G, Tulandi T. Effects of adenomyosis on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis. Fert Ster. 2017;108(3):483-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.025 Maheshwari A, Gurunath S, Fatima F, Bhattacharya S. Adenomyosis and subfertility: a systematic review of prevalence, diagnosis, treatment and fertility outcomes. Human Repr. 2012;18(4):374-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms006 Xiao Y, Li T, Xia E, Yang X, Sun X, Zhou Y. Expression of integrin β3 and osteopontin in the eutopic endometrium of adenomyosis during the implantation window. European J Obst Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(2):419-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.007 Fischer CP, Kayisili U, Taylor HS. HOXA10 expression is decreased in endometrium of women with adenomyosis. Fert Ster. 2011;95(3):1133-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.060 Fraser IS. Non-contraceptive health benefits of intrauterine hormonal systems. Contraception. 2010;82(5):396-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2010.05.005 Ekin M, Cengiz H, Ayağ ME, Kaya C, Yasar L, Savan K. Effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on urinary symptoms in patients with adenomyosis. European J Obst Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(2):517-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.019 Fawzy M, Mesbah Y. Comparison of dienogest versus triptorelin acetate in premenopausal women with adenomyosis: a prospective clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obst. 2015;292:1267-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3755-5 Nagata C, Yanagida S, Okamoto A, Morikawa A, Sugimoto K, Okamoto S, et al. Risk factors of treatment discontinuation due to uterine bleeding in adenomyosis patients treated with dienogest. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012;38(4):639-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01778.x Aksenenko AA, Ibragimova MK, Gavisova AA, Mishieva NG. Effectiveness of ivf in treating infertility in patients with internal endometriosis (adenomyosis). Obst Gynecol. 2021;15(1):120-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.1.120-125 Choudhury S, Jena SK, Mitra S, Padhy BM, Mohakud S. Comparison of efficacy between levonorgestrel intrauterine system and dienogest in adenomyosis: a randomized clinical trial. Therap Advan Reproduc Health. 2024;18:2348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/26334941241227401 Hou X, Xing J, Shan H, Mei J, Sun Y, Yan G, et al. The effect of adenomyosis on IVF after long or ultra-long GnRH agonist treatment. Reproductive biomedicine online. 2020;41(5):845-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.07.027

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (24)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK