Imaging for Adenomyosis: Making the Diagnosis by Sonography
Other
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This paper reviews the use of sonography for diagnosing adenomyosis, detailing characteristic imaging findings.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a systematic approach for ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis.
DESIGN: Stepwise demonstration of the ultrasound features of adenomyosis with narrated video footage.
SETTING: In 2015, the International Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment group published a consensus on which terminology to use when describing myometrial lesions seen on ultrasonography [12]. However, 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound features of adenomyosis are demonstrated most optimally using video clips.
INTERVENTIONS: A systematic description, including pictograms of individual features of adenomyosis, is correlated to the typical findings of adenomyosis in 2D and 3D ultrasound images and video clips.
CONCLUSION: A structured, systematic description of individual 2D and 3D ultrasound features is important for a correct diagnosis of adenomyosis [3-5].
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
References (5)
- Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis via openalex
- Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group via openalex
- Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate? via openalex
- W2014463766 via openalex
- W2906323089 via openalex
Cited by (7)
- Clinical and Echographic Assessment of Adenomyosis and Endometriosis Using the MUSA Criteria (2021) 2026
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound for Adenomyosis-A Blinded, Retrospective, Single-Expert Validation Study of the 2022 MUSA Guidelines 2025
- Different subtypes of ultrasound-diagnosed adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis 2023
- Sonographic Assessment of Uterine Biometry for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Adenomyosis in a Tertiary Outpatient Clinic 2022
- Sonographic Signs of Adenomyosis in Women with Endometriosis Are Associated with Infertility 2021
- 90 YEARS OF PROGESTERONE: Selective progesterone receptor modulators in gynaecological therapies 2020
- An Abundance of Studies But Dearth of Evidence regarding Endometriosis and Adenomyosis 2019
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-31T06:08:22.434808+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:25:41.699768+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-31T06:28:23.984441+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK