Intro
Endometriosis is a disease which pathogenesis is not fully known. Several factors
are responsible for the onset of the disease. However, the etiology of all forms
of endometriosis has not been fully explained to date ( Bulletti et al ., 2010 ). It’s the most
common disease in the female population in reproductive age ( Broi et al ., 2019 ).
Endometriosis is the leading cause of infertility and poorer outcomes of
assisted reproduction ( Marí-Alexandre
et al ., 2018 ). From the appearance of the first
symptoms to the surgical diagnosis, it takes an average of 4 to 11 years. A
possible reason is the non-specificity of the symptoms of the disease as well as
the impossibility of non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis ( Agarwal et al ., 2019 ).
Ectopic endometrial tissue interacting with an aberrant immune system leads to
the chronic inflammation that characterizes endometriosis ( Wang et al ., 2020 ). Such an inflamed area
causes pain that is not the same in all patients, regardless of the size of the
lesions. In addition to pain, endometriosis often causes irregular menstrual
bleeding, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea and, as is known, infertility. It is a
chronic debilitating disease that significantly reduces the quality of life of a
woman with endometriosis ( Parasar et
al ., 2017 ).
The American Society for Reproductive Medicine has created a classification of
endometriosis called the ASRM classification ( Metzemaekers et al ., 2020 ). The ASRM classification
was then supplemented with the ENZIAN classification and is used as the rASRM
classification ( Lee et al .,
2021 ). The pathological processes that occur with the development of
endometriosis are invasion, adhesion, proliferation, angiogenesis and impaired
immunity. The above-mentioned pathophysiological processes are mutually
maintained and lead to disorders of the immune and endocrinological systems and
changes in the anatomical relations of the reproductive organs ( Burney & Giudice, 2012 ).
The aim of this research is to compare the concentrations of total proteins in
the urine of subjects with endometriosis with those of the control group and
possibly identify a biomarker for the diagnosis of endometriosis.
Results
Qualitative analysis of protein in urine-protein sediment samples was analyzed with
one-dimensional electrophoresis. All urine samples of the endometriosis group and
the control group were analyzed using this method. In all analyzed samples, proteins
are clearly present and separated. In all samples of urine protein deposits, there
is a sufficient amount of proteins of different molecular masses required for
further analytical analyses.
Quantitative determination of protein in urine-protein sediment samples was
performed using the Bradford method. A statistically significant difference in
the concentration of total proteins was recorded between the samples of the
group with endometriosis and the samples of the control group. The Wilcoxon test
with a confidence level of 95% showed that the concentrations of secreted
proteins (µg/µl) in the urine analyzed by the Bradford method in
samples with endometriosis (n=84) were statistically significantly higher than
in samples of the control group (n=57), p <0.05. After the
concentration of total proteins in the urine is greater than 5,000
(µg/µl), there is a significant grouping of samples with
endometriosis, while at concentrations lower than this value, samples of both
groups were grouped.
The analysis of samples of endometriosis subgroups rASRM I-II and rASRM III-IV
did not show a difference in the concentration of excreted total proteins in the
urine. The Wilcoxon test with a confidence level of 95% showed that there was no
statistically significant difference in the values of the concentration of
secreted proteins (µg/µl) in the urine, analyzed by the Bradford
method in subgroups of EME samples - rASRM I-II (n=42) and rASRM III-IV IV
(N=42) ( Figure 1 , Table 1 ).
Parameters of the comparison of total protein concentration
(µg/µl) in the urine of the group of test subjects with
endometriosis and the control group.
Figure 1 Presentation of the proportion of urine samples in each group
depending on the concentration range of total proteins
(µg/µl) in the group of subjects with endometriosis
and subjects of the control group (Bradford method).
Presentation of the proportion of urine samples in each group
depending on the concentration range of total proteins
(µg/µl) in the group of subjects with endometriosis
and subjects of the control group (Bradford method).
Discussion
In addition to the fact that endometriosis is a disease that affects a number of
physiological reactions in the body, it also plays an unquestionable role in the
infertility of patients. There are different levels of causes of infertility
associated with endometriosis. We often see the disruption of anatomical
relationships through the formation of cystic formations, adhesions and fibrosis,
which disrupts the tubo-ovarian relationship, reduced ovarian reserves and impaired
receptivity of the endometrium ( Bulletti et
al ., 2010 ). The results of this study show a statistically
significant association of endometriosis with different types of proteins in the
urine. The concentration of total excreted proteins in the first morning urine is
statistically significantly higher in the group of samples with endometriosis
compared with the control group. Higher concentrations of total excreted proteins in
urine were shown in all stages of disease extension according to the rASRM criteria;
however, no statistically significant difference was shown in protein concentration
in urine depending on the degree of endometriosis extension.
Lessey et al . (2015) did not show a difference in the concentration
of total proteins in the urine in samples from the group with endometriosis compared
to the samples from the control group. Contrary to the results obtained in the
aforementioned study, in our investigation we noticed a statistically significantly
higher concentration of total proteins in the urine samples with endometriosis. The
difference in recorded results was probably due to the different pre-analytical
preparation of urine in this study, in contrast to Lessey et al . (2015 ). With the development of
endometriosis, a number of proteins and their precursors are secreted with the aim
of achieving an equilibrium state in the areas of ectopic invasion and proliferation
of endometrial cells ( Xiao et al .,
2017 ). It is believed that one of the most important roles in the
etiopathogenesis of endometriosis is played by the pro-inflammatory activated immune
system. In the peritoneal space, immune factors are secreted in an increased amount,
they modulate the immune response and open space for extrauterine implantation and
proliferation of endometrial cells.
Despite numerous studies, it cannot be asserted whether the pro-inflammatory
activated immune system is the cause of endometriosis, or a factor in its
progression ( Ahn et al .,
2015 ). Peritoneal fluid in endometriosis is rich in pro-inflammatory cells.
The resulting anaphylatoxins stimulate peritoneal macrophages and mast cells to
increase secretion of cytokines and histamine ( Agostinis et al ., 2021 ). Proteases hydrolyze peptide
bonds and break down protein chains into smaller fragments. With such reactions,
proteins lose their controlled primary activity and cause the breakdown of the
extracellular space, which opens up space for the development of endometriosis
( Bałkowiec et al., 2018 ).
Protease inhibitors have the opposite effect and suppress their activity by binding
to the receptors of enzymatically active proteins ( Porter et al ., 2016 ).
In ectopic endometrial cells, there is an inadequate relationship between apoptosis
factors and those that promote cell growth ( Li
et al ., 2020 ). In addition to the uneven
relationship between growth factors and apoptosis, ectopic endometrial cells are
very resistant to apoptosis. Altered cells of the peritoneum enable better
efficiency of proteins that promote proliferation and reduced function of apoptotic
proteins ( Renner et al .,
2015 ). These are just some of the processes that occur during the
development of endometriosis. The body continuously tries to achieve homeostasis.
Since homeostasis in endometriosis is impossible to achieve, the increased
production of all proteins occurs. Both those that serve the proliferation of
endometriotic cells, as well as those proteins that try to suppress such processes
( Zhang et al ., 2006 ).
The result is an increased production of proteins that are eventually excreted in
the urine and it is possible to detect them and determine their concentration.
Proliferation, invasion and apoptosis of ectopic endometrial cells with the
formation of adhesions in a chronically inflammatory changed medium is the basis of
endometriosis ( Agostinis et al .,
2021 ; Ferrero, 2019 ). All the
pathological processes that occur during this have as a result the increased
production of proteins, and it is not surprising that we can detect them in the
urine ( Grande et al .,
2020 ).
However, although we notice an increased concentration of protein in the urine in
subjects with endometriosis, the progression of the disease does not lead to even
greater protein production. It is possible that an increase in the degree of
progression of endometriosis leads to a kind of exhaustion of the organism, which is
manifested by a reduced possibility of further expression of proteins aimed at
establishing homeostasis. Such a condition opens the way for the development of
endometriosis with a severe clinical picture.
Conclusions
Endometriosis is a disease for which it is necessary to find a specific non-invasive
biomarker so that treatment can be started at the very beginning of the disease
development. By postponing diagnosis, and thus treatment, the processes that take
place in the development of endometriosis, which among other things has infertility
as a reason for its progress. The concentration of total proteins in the urine could
be a possible biomarker for endometriosis diagnosis.
Materials|Methods
For this study, an ethical permit was obtained from the committee of the Rijeka
Clinical Hospital Center (Approval number: 003-05/21-1/124). All patients who were
included in the research gave their consent by signing an Informed Consent Form.
Urine samples were collected from 141 subjects who were treated at the Clinic for
Gynecology and Obstetrics of KBC Rijeka for suspected endometriosis and other cystic
ovarian diseases. The day before the surgical treatment, the first morning urine was
obtained from the subjects. All test subjects were between the ages of 25 and 35, in
the proliferative phase of their menstrual cycles. Subjects with kidney disease were
excluded from the study, which was determined by urea and creatinine levels.
Endometriosis was diagnosed by histopathological diagnosis after surgical treatment.
According to the histopathological diagnosis, the urine samples were divided into a
group of subjects with endometriosis (n=84) and a control group of subjects without
endometriosis (n=57). Subjects with endometriosis were divided into rASRM I-II
(n=42) and rASRM III-IV (n=42) subgroups. The subgroups, that is, the stage of the
disease, was determined by surgery.
The urine is centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 30 min (Hettich centrifuge, Universal
320/320 R Andreas Hettich GmbH & Co., Tuttlingen, Germany). 10% TCA and 3%
DTT were added to the total volume of acetone. The urine supernatant (7.5 ml) is
mixed with acetone solution (20 ml). The mixture of urine and acetone (ratio
1:3) was kept at a temperature of -20°C for a minimum of 20 hours to a maximum
of 24 hours. After repeated centrifugation and decantation, a protein sediment
of urine was obtained, to which a 5 times larger amount of lysis buffer was
added, which was a mixture of 2.1g urea, 0.2g CHAPS, 0.7612g thiourea and ddH₂O
up to 5 ml. The resulting volume was weighed and 1% protease inhibitors are
added to it.
Qualitative determination of protein in urine by one-dimensional electrophoresis
was performed to check the quality of the pre-analytical preparation of urine
protein precipitates. The method of one-dimensional protein gel electrophoresis
gives us information about the purity of the samples, the amount and the
molecular weight of the protein. In this study, one-dimensional gel
electrophoresis was performed in the classical way. An electrophoresis system
(Bio-Rad Hercules, CA, USA) was used.
For proteomic analyzes of proteins in urine, protein concentration was determined
using the Bradford reagent, which was prepared in the classic way. The resulting
Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 solution has a very characteristic blue color and
is known as Bradford’s reagent. The standard is bovine serum albumin BSA (from
Eng. bovine serum albumin) protein concentration (γ=1 mg/mL). We used a
device for colorometric protein determination (Spectrometer Varian Cary 100 and
software Cary WinUV, USA).
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.