Histologic and receptor analysis of primary and secondary vestibulodynia and controls: a prospective study

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2010 · vol. 202(6) , pp. 614.e1–614.e8 · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.028 · PMID:20430353 · W1987801318
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 7 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12

This prospective study analyzed the histologic features and receptor expression in vulvar tissue from women with primary vestibulodynia, secondary vestibulodynia, and healthy controls.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveThe objective of the study was to assess the association between hormone receptor densities, pain nerves, and inflammation in vestibulodynia patients.Study designIn a prospective study, tender and nontender biopsies from 10 primary and 10 secondary vestibulodynia patients were compared with biopsies in 4 nontender controls. Hormone receptors were evaluated using immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor-alpha and -beta, androgen, and progesterone receptors. Inflammation, nerves, and mast cells were assessed histologically. Statistical analysis was by Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance, paired Student t test, and Wilcoxon rank test.ResultsTender sites from primary vestibulodynia had increased nerve density compared with secondary and control biopsies (P = .01). Tender sites in secondary vestibulodynia had more lymphocytes than tender primary sites and control biopsies (P < .0001). Mast cells were increased in tender sites compared with nontender and controls. There were no differences in hormone receptor expression.ConclusionMarkers of inflammation differed between primary and secondary vestibulodynia and controls.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (32)

Cited by (7)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-09T06:42:26.407065+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK