Mullerianosis vesical: una entidad muy infrecuente

In: Archivos Españoles de Urología (Ed. impresa) · 2009 · vol. 62(2) , pp. 150–2 · doi:10.4321/s0004-06142009000200013 · PMID:19459247 · W2104014647
article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This case report details bladder mullerianosis in a 30-year-old female, characterized by voiding disturbances synchronized with menstruation and confirmed via imaging and cystoscopy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This paper reports a rare case of bladder mullerianosis in a 30-year-old woman with voiding disturbances that coincided with menstruation and a history of miscarriage; vaginal ultrasound identified an exophytic intravesical lesion that was confirmed by cystoscopy. Transurethral resection was performed, and histopathology showed mixed glandular components predominantly tubaric-like, with associated endometrial-like and endocervical-like elements; the authors report no endoscopic relapse after one year of follow-up. The discussion reviews that mullerianosis is defined as the presence of at least two Müllerian tissue types in the urinary bladder and highlights proposed origins including implantation versus metaplastic mechanisms, noting that clinical symptoms are nonspecific and diagnosis relies on pathology. This single-case report has limited ability to characterize natural history beyond its short follow-up and emphasizes the scarcity of published cases. This paper is centrally about endometriosis-adjacent Müllerian pathology in the urinary bladder — specifically bladder mullerianosis containing endometrial-like components alongside endocervical/endosalpingial-like elements.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report a new case of bladder mullerianosis. METHODS: We present the case of a 30 year old female patient with history of miscarriage, who refers voiding dis-turbances with menstruations. Vaginal ultrasound showed an exophytic bladder lesion, which was confirmed by cistoscopy. Endoscopic resection was indicated. RESULTS: The pathological study of tissues obtained showed mixed glandular structures with predominant tubaric-like type, in association with endometrial- and endocervical-like elements. No evidence of endoscopic relapse after one year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We contribute with a new case of bladder mullerianosis. We emphasize the scarcity of its published reports. We support the option of an endoscopic surgery for these patients.
Full text 10,348 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 8 sections · click to expand

Method

We present the case of a 30 year old female patient with history of miscarriage, who refers voiding dis- turbances with menstruations. Vaginal ultrasound showed an exophytic bladder lesion, which was confirmed by cis - toscopy. Endoscopic resection was indicated. Arch. Esp. Urol. 2009; 62 (2): 150-152 Resumen.- OBJETIVO: Descripción de un nuevo caso de mullerianosis vesical. MÉTODO: Presentamos el caso de una paciente mujer de 30 años con antecedentes de aborto, que refiere moles - tias miccionales coincidiendo con las menstruaciones. Una ecografía vaginal demostró la existencia de lesión exofíti - ca vesical, confirmada posteriormente por cistoscopia. Se indicó resección transuretral. RESULTADOS: En el estudio histopatológico de los tejidos obtenidos se objetivó un componente glandular mixto de tipo predominantemente tubárico, con elementos endome - triales y endocervicales asociados. No evidencia de reci - diva endoscópica tras un año de seguimiento. CONCLUSIONES: Aportamos un nuevo caso de mulleria- nosis vesical. Destacamos el escaso número de casos pu - blicados. Defendemos la opción quirúrgica endoscópica en estas pacientes.

Introduction

Bladder endometriosis, as an example of ectopic gyne - cological tissue, is a well known entity in Urology, despi- te of a relatively limited amount of reports. What urolo - gists usually have less knowledge about is the possibility - although in unfrequent fashion - of association between endocervical and tubaric epithelium at the same patient, as in the following case. CASE REPORT We report the case of a 30 years old woman, smoker of six cigarettes per day, with history of miscarriage two and a half years before being studied by the Ginecolo - gy department for infertility. In this context, during the performance of a vaginal ecography, an exophytic in - travesical lesion was detected, aproximately 24 mm in Palabras clave: Mullerianosis. Vejiga. Cirugía.

Keywords

Mullerianosis. Bladder. Surgery.

Results

The pathological study of tissues obtained showed mixed glandular structures with predominant tubaric-like type, in association with endometrial- and endocervical-like elements. No evidence of endoscopic relapse after one year of follow-up.

Conclusions

We contribute with a new case of bladder mullerianosis. We emphasize the scarcity of its pu- blished reports. We support the option of an endoscopic surgery for these patients. diameter, and located at right posterolateral wall, with tabications inside (Figure 1). She was sent to the Urology department, where she re - ferred certain voiding disturbances coinciding with men- struations, without macroscopic haematuria nor other accompanying manifestations. Blood laboratory values were normal, and urine test showed 18 rbc/ mL as sin - gle significant outcome. An intravenous pielography was indicated, without abnormal findings; and cistosco- py was performed as well, showing an exophitic lesion, an endoscopic field in size, located at right posterior bladder wall, with pseudocystic surface. Transurethral resection of that lesion was indicated, achieved in a complete fashion, and with good posto - peratory evolution. The pathological study showed a bladder wall coated with focally hyperplastic endothe - lium, as well as morphologically predominant tubaric- like glandular structures inside the lamina propria and muscular layer, and less frequent endometrial and endo- cervical-like components, what matched with the diagno- se of bladder mullerianosis (Figures 2 y 3). After one year of follow-up, our patient remains symptom- free, and with no evidence of endoscopic relapse at checkups performed afterwards.

Discussion

Mullerian implants at urinary bladder is a fact with sig - nificant report availability throughout urological literatu- re. With difference, the most frequent entity comprises presence of endometrial rests - endometriosis -, and its spanish published series has been recently compiled in FIGURA 1. Transvaginal ultrasonography showing an exophytic intravesical lesion. 151MULLERIANOSIS OF THE URINARY BLADDER: A RARE ENTITY a throrough fashion (1). however, faced with the descrip- tion of accompanying endocervical- and/ or endosal - pingial-like bladder implants in some patients, the term “mullerianosis” was established by Young y Clement (2), being defined as the combination of at least two of those mentioned tissue types. The variant comprising simultaneous endometrial, endo- cervical and endosalpingial rests, like in our case re - port, has scarcely described, usually in form of single case, apart from the mentioned 1996 original publica - tion. The same as an isolated endometrial form, its origin has been subject of several theories, two of which may be emphasized nowadays: firstly, the possibility of an implant from extraurinary origin leaving the correspon - ding ginecological organs is suggested (3); however, existence of simultaneous mullerian tissue from different anatomical origin, frequently located at hormonosensiti- ve bladder areas such as posterior wall, can support a potential metaplastic tissular mechanism for that entity (4), and a growing amount of authors agree with this last option (5,6). The most frequent clinical reported manifestations of mullerianosis are irritative voiding symptoms (7) and haematuria (8), affecting female patients througout the third or early fourth decades of life, and usually linked to menstruation cycle. This unspecific sintomatology makes image-based diagnosis - specially ultrasonography - and cistoscopy, necessary to confirm or not the presence of bladder lesion. A pseudocystic endoscopic look raises the differential diagnosis with other entities (8) such as cystic/ glandular cystopathy or isolated endometriosis - especially in this last case because of a chocolate-like liquid content when cutting its surface. Final diagnosis of mullerianosis is based on pathological study of obtained FIGURA 2. Bladder wall containing glandular structures with predominant tubaric-like morphology (H & E; x 10). Detail from these structures (bottom right) (H & R; x 20). tissues (2), showing - in several proportions according to the different cases - glandular structures coated with a single layer of column-like endometrial-type epithelium, endocervical-type – with cilia and mucinous secretion -, and tubaric-type - with pseudopapilar structures -. Fre - quent invasion of deeper layers of the bladder wall is a distinguising feature of mullerian implants compared with other benign lesions such as nephrogenic adenoma and the abovementioned cystic/ glandular cystopathy (8). We support the endoscopical surgical option from a do- uble point of view: diagnostic and therapeutical effec - tiveness, as reported by other authors (7,8). Adyuvant hormonotherapy was not considered in our case cause o an apparently complete resection of the lesion, the patient´s persistent wish of pregnancy in a short-term, as well as pathological predominance of non-endometrial mullerian glands, theoretically less hormonosensitive (9). The relapse of the lesion has not been yet reported, al - though its follow-up is recommended because of its logi- cal absence of data based on large series, especially if a report showing a case complicated with endometrioid carcinoma (10) is taken into account.

Conclusion

Mullerianosis represents an entity that, in spite of its un - frequency, should be considered among those differen - tial diagnosis for benign bladder lesions. The scarcity of reports makes the future publication of a growing num - ber of cases be necessary for better knowledge of its main features and natural history. FIGURA 3. Associated endometrial-like (H & E; x 20) and endocervical-like (bottom right) (H & E; x 20) components. 152 N. A. Cruz Guerra, M. D. Gómez Raposo, María J. Baizán García et al. Pastor Navarro H, Donate Moreno MJ, Giménez Bachs J M et al. Endometriosis vesical. Revisión de la literatura, con especial referencia a la españo - la y aportación de dos nuevos casos. Arch Esp Urol 2006; 59: 111-22. Young RH, Clement PB. Müllerianosis of the urina- ry bladder. Mod Pathol 1996; 9: 731-737. Javert CT. Pathogenesis of endometriosis based on endometrial homeoplasia, direct extension, exfolia - tion and implantation, lymphatic and hematogenous metastasis including 5 cases reports of endometrial tissue in pelvic lymph nodes. Cancer 1949; 2: 399- 410. Krestchmer HI. Endometriosis of the bladder. J Urol 1945, 53: 459-65. Batt RE, Smith RA, Buck Louis GM, et al. Mülleria- nosis. Histol Histopathol 2007; 22: 1161-1166. Koren J, Mensikova J, Mukensnabl P, et al. Mulle - rianosis of the urinary bladder: report of a case with suggested metaplastic origin. Virchows Arch 2006; 449: 268-271. Tomada N, Silva J, Vendeira P, et al. [Bladder mu - llerianosis: a case report]. Acta Urológica 2006; 23: 59-61. Kim HJ, Lee TJ, Kim MK, et al. Muellerianosis of the urinary bladder, endocervicosis type: a case re - port. J Korean Med Sci 2001; 16: 123-126. Cao ZY , Eppenberger U, Roos W, et al. Cytosol es- trogen and progesterone receptor levels measured in normal and pathological tissue of endometrium, endocervical mucosa and cervical vaginal portion. Arch Gynecol 1983; 233: 109-119. Garavan F, Grainger R, Jeffers M. Endometrioid car- cinoma of the urinary bladder complicating vesical Mullerianosis: a case report and review of the litera- ture. Virchows Arch 2004; 444: 587-589. 1. **2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. *8. 9. 10.

References

AND RECOMENDED READINGS (*of special interest, **of outstanding interest)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (9)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T05:42:58.953575+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK