Danazol versus a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist as preoperative preparation for hysteroscopic metroplasty

In: Fertility and Sterility · 1996 · vol. 65(1) , pp. 186–188 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58049-2 · PMID:8557138 · W2343470492
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 8 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07

This study compared the effectiveness of danazol versus a GnRH agonist in preparing patients for hysteroscopic metroplasty, assessing outcomes related to uterine septum reduction and patient recovery.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of danazol and a GnRH agonist as preoperative preparation for hysteroscopic metroplasty in women with septate uterus.DesignProspective randomized clinical study.SettingTertiary care center.PatientsThirty patients with septate uterus.InterventionsThe patients were randomized to treatment with danazol 600 mg/d for 2 to 4 weeks (n = 15) or with leuprolide acetate depot 3.75 mg for 2 months (n = 15) as preoperative therapy for hysteroscopic metroplasty.Main outcome measuresAt the intervention the hysteroscopist evaluated difficulty in dilation of the cervical canal, presence of endometrial fragments, bleeding, difficulty in maneuvering the resectoscope, and operating time.ResultsBoth the treatments were well tolerated. Metroplasty was simpler overall in the danazol group and also faster in introducing the resectoscope through the cervical canal and maneuvering it in the uterine cavity were both easier. Bleeding was modest in both groups and the anatomic outcome of the operation was similar.ConclusionShort preoperative preparation with danazol results in favorable operating conditions at limited costs with minimal side effects.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (6)

Cited by (7)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-13T18:37:28.025090+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-07T06:27:18.705824+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK