Advancements in the application of uterine ultrasound elastography

review OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

Recent studies show uterine elastography is advancing diagnosis and evaluation of the nongravid and infertile uterus, with ongoing research in fertility treatment prediction and distinguishing uterine fibroids from adenomyosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text

This purpose-of-review article surveys recent advances in ultrasound elastography for assessing tissue stiffness in both the normal nongravid uterus and uterine conditions in gynecologic patients, with emphasis on infertile populations. It reports that studies in the nongravid uterus found no association between menopausal status, age, or menstrual phase and changes in uterine tissue stiffness, while studies in myometrial disease show conflicting evidence on whether uterine fibroids can be distinguished from adenomyosis. It also describes expanding research in infertile patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization using shear wave elastography (SWE) to develop predictive models and mentions potential roles in diagnosing uterine/cervical lesions and prognosticating fertility treatment outcomes. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews recent advances in ultrasound elastography in diagnosing and evaluating the normal nongravid uterus and the infertile uterus in the gynecologic patient. RECENT FINDINGS: Focusing on the most recent primary literature, studies have demonstrated new findings among a breadth of gynecologic clinical settings. Studies in the nongravid uterus have found that menopausal status, age, and menstrual phase have not been associated with changes in uterine tissue stiffness. Focusing on myometrial disease, there have been conflicting data regarding the ability to distinguish uterine fibroids from adenomyosis. One area of expanding research surrounding uterine elastography includes the infertile population, where ongoing studies attempt to provide a predictive model using shear wave elastography (SWE) in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization. SUMMARY: Ultrasound elastography has become an increasingly studied and utilized tool in assessing physiologic and pathologic processes in the field of gynecology. Evaluating tissue stiffness through strain and SWE can serve to improve diagnosis of various uterine and cervical lesions, as well as prognosticate outcomes after fertility treatments. This growing area of research will continue to establish the role and application of ultrasound elastography into clinical practice.
Full text 1,363 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Purpose of review This article reviews recent advances in ultrasound elastography in diagnosing and evaluating the normal nongravid uterus and the infertile uterus in the gynecologic patient. Recent findings Focusing on the most recent primary literature, studies have demonstrated new findings among a breadth of gynecologic clinical settings. Studies in the nongravid uterus have found that menopausal status, age, and menstrual phase have not been associated with changes in uterine tissue stiffness. Focusing on myometrial disease, there have been conflicting data regarding the ability to distinguish uterine fibroids from adenomyosis. One area of expanding research surrounding uterine elastography includes the infertile population, where ongoing studies attempt to provide a predictive model using shear wave elastography (SWE) in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization. Summary Ultrasound elastography has become an increasingly studied and utilized tool in assessing physiologic and pathologic processes in the field of gynecology. Evaluating tissue stiffness through strain and SWE can serve to improve diagnosis of various uterine and cervical lesions, as well as prognosticate outcomes after fertility treatments. This growing area of research will continue to establish the role and application of ultrasound elastography into clinical practice.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques Elasticity Imaging Techniques

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-10T06:07:26.400732+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-07-10T06:05:27.416433+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine