Cytoreductive surgery in ovarian carcinoma: feasibility and morbidity
This study examined cytoreductive surgery for ovarian carcinoma, finding improved optimal cytoreduction rates with experience and that bowel resection did not increase morbidity, with stapling devices facilitating acceptable colonic reanastomosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study evaluated the feasibility and morbidity of primary cytoreductive surgery for ovarian carcinoma in 70 patients treated at the University of California, Los Angeles, between 1974 and 1984. The researchers found that optimal cytoreduction rates improved significantly from 56.4% to 87.1% as surgical experience increased over time. Common postoperative complications included fever and prolonged ileus, while bowel resection was necessary in 20% of cases without increasing overall morbidity. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
931 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-13T09:25:22.628771+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:40.384591+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine