The role of salivary antioxidant level in polycystic ovary syndrome women under assisted reproductive technology treatment: A case-control study.

OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0

Abstract

BackgroundInfertility is defined as the inability to conceive after 12 months of regular unprotected intercourse. Approximately 85% of infertile couples have an identifiable cause, one of the most common causes of infertility is polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The reduction of antioxidant levels in serum and follicular fluid in infertile women compared to healthy women shows the importance of further studying these markers.ObjectiveTo study salivary and serum antioxidant levels in PCOS participants under assisted reproductive technology.Materials and methodsThis case-control study was conducted on 80 women in 2 groups including normal participants as control and PCOS groups (n = 40/each). Serum and salivary antioxidant levels such as saliva superoxide dismutase (SOD), saliva anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), serum SOD, serum total oxidant status, and serum AMH were measured.ResultsThe average age of participants was 31.6 ± 5.4 yr. In both the saliva and serum, antioxidant levels differed significantly between the PCOS and control groups. Key findings showed that the PCOS group had different antioxidant levels and higher serum AMH levels compared to the control group, with all differences being statistically significant (p < 0.05).ConclusionOur finding underscored that saliva antioxidant levels, especially SOD, are a good marker for PCOS diagnosis. It is noninvasive, can easily be performed by the participants, and can be collected in various settings without specialized equipment.
Full text 18,876 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 2 sections · click to expand

Section

A. Aleyasin, M. Bahmaee, N. Gholizadeh, and M. Koopaie: Conceptualization, methodology, writing-review, and editing. A. Mortazavi Milani: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing-original draft preparation-review and editing. MJ. Kharrazifard: Formal analysis. M. Aghahosseini: Methodology and investigation. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Coi Statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-07T06:07:59.301721+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0