Relationship between the prognosis of conception and the location of pelvic involvement in endometriosis: significance of the TOP (tube, ovary, peritoneum) classification

other OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-12

This study classified 99 infertile patients with endometriosis using the TOP system and found tubal and peritoneal involvement negatively correlated with conception rates, suggesting treatment should prioritize tubal severity.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

To determine the main factors that affect the prognosis for conception in endometriosis-associated infertility, 99 infertile patients with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis were classified according to the new TOP classification, which we have developed to evaluate the severity of endometriosis by site, i.e., fallopian tubes (T), ovaries (O) and the peritoneum (P). According to the TOP classification, a negative correlation between the pregnancy rate after treatment and the severity of lesions was noted in case of tubal and peritoneal involvement, but not when the ovaries were involved. If there was no tubal involvement or only unilateral tubal involvement, high pregnancy rates were achieved for patients with ovarian endometrioma (87%) and for those with partial or complete posterior cul-de-sac obliteration (83%). The results suggest that for endometriosis-associated infertility, the treatment modality should be selected according to the severity of tubal involvement, which is considered to contribute to infertility more than ovarian or peritoneal lesions.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisendometriomainfertility

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Fertilization Infertility, Female Adult Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Pregnancy Prognosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-06T09:34:12.023084+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:34.315996+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine