Cytological Effects of Gestagen or Danazol on Dysplasia and Carcinoma in situ of the Cervix
This study examined the cytological effects of gestagen and danazol treatments on cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ, finding that gestagen therapy induced regression in some lesions while danazol had minimal effects.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper studied cytological changes in cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ in patients with coexisting endometriosis, using exfoliative cytology to assess hormone responsiveness after treatment with an EP combination “pseudopregnancy” therapy or danazol. It reported that dysplasia and carcinoma in situ showed morphological alterations in response to exogenous steroid hormones, with pseudopregnancy therapy showing regression in lesions up to moderate dysplasia (and some severe dysplasia), more frequent stability in most severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ, and progression in some carcinoma in situ, whereas danazol produced fewer changes. A stated caveat is that the biological character of these borderline lesions cannot be fully inferred from morphology alone, motivating the hormone-response comparison. Relevance to endometriosis: the study specifically includes endometriosis as a comorbidity and treats it to evaluate hormone-driven changes in cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ, making it directly situated within endometriosis-associated hormonal response research.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
925 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (2)
- EVALUATION OF DANAZOL AS AN ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006254-196108000-00040 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-13T18:27:55.367740+00:00