Aussagekraft der Tumormarker CA 125, CA 19-9, CA 15-3 und CEA bei Endometriose
This study measured CA 125, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and CEA in endometriosis patients before and after buserelin treatment, finding only CA 125 significantly decreased, reflecting ovarian function loss, not disease regression.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The study measured serum tumor markers CA 125, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, and CEA in 42 women with histologically verified genital external endometriosis who received a 6-month course of the LHRH analogue buserelin. Pre-treatment sensitivity for detecting endometriosis was highest for CA 125 (49%) and low for CA 19-9 and CA 15-3 (both 19%), with CEA showing 0% sensitivity, and CA 125 had only a weak, nonconvincing correlation with AFS stage (r = 0.40); after treatment, marker–stage correlations were even less clear. Only CA 125 significantly decreased during therapy (p < 0.05), closely paralleling therapy-induced hypoestrogenism, and the authors conclude that measuring these markers cannot replace surgical/histologic diagnostic procedures. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—specifically evaluating the diagnostic and treatment-monitoring value of tumor markers (CA 125, CA 19-9, CA 15-3, CEA) in endometriosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (3)
Cited by (3)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-22T06:15:23.361955+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:54.876058+00:00