[The risk-benefit balance of estrogen-progestogen hormonal contraception]
other
OA: hybrid
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Combined hormonal contraception (CHC) remains the most widely used contraceptive strategy, particularly in France. While the benefit-risk balance is very beneficial for the majority of women, its use must be cautious in some clinical situations and in particular in women at vascular risk. It is therefore essential to provide information on all the vascular risk factors before prescribing any CHC, regardless of their route of administration. From an oncological point of view, if the use of CHCs is associated with a slight increase in the risk of breast cancer, their potential benefits persist for many years after their discontinuation for the risk of ovarian and endometrial cancer. These benefits counteract largely the risk of breast cancer. Finally, CHCs provide non-contraceptive benefits, especially in clinical situations such as dysmenorrhea or severe endometriosis. Therefore, it is necessary to precisely assess the clinical context of each woman in order to adapt the best contraceptive strategy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-16T06:07:01.518242+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:24:03.506079+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine