Microwave endometrial ablation for menorrhagia: outcome at 2 years--experience of a district general hospital

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

Microwave endometrial ablation for menorrhagia demonstrated an 80% success rate at 6 months, decreasing to 70% at 2 years, with higher efficacy observed in women aged 45 and over.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

One hundred and twenty-three women underwent microwave endometrial ablation (MEA) for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB). The mean age at treatment was 40.2 years and the average treatment time was 2 minutes 50 seconds. All patients stayed as day cases, except for two who stayed overnight, one due to pain and the other due to urinary retention. The follow-up was carried out at 6 months, 1 and 2 years, respectively. The success rate was 80%, 76% and 70% at 6 months and 1-year and 2-year follow-up. The patient satisfaction rate was 80%, 75% and 68% at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years, respectively. However, in women 45 years old and over the success rate was more than 90%, suggesting that MEA could be a preferred procedure for treatment of DUB in this age group compared to younger women, especially in those who do not benefit from the mirena intrauterine system or decline it. Approximately 70% of patients, who underwent hysterectomy due to the failure of treatment, had uterine/pelvic pathology in the form of adenomyosis, fibroid uterus or endometriosis; therefore prior to MEA, proper patient selection is vital. There were a few minor complications but no uterine perforation or emergency hysterectomies in the group studied.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisadenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometrium Hospitals, General Menorrhagia Microwaves Treatment Outcome Adult Endometrium Female Humans Menorrhagia Microwaves Middle Aged Postoperative Complications

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (5)

Cited by (5)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:35.797702+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK