Pelvic pain following microwave endometrial ablation—is hysteroscopic adhesiolysis worthwhile?
article
OA: closed
CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed
this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is
available through Endo Lab. The
publisher's page (linked below)
is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional
access, use "Find at my library".
AI-generated summary
This observational study found that hysteroscopic adhesiolysis improved pelvic pain in 45% of patients who previously underwent microwave endometrial ablation.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (4)
- Post-ablation-tubal sterilization syndrome. 1993
- Postablation-tubal sterilization syndrome 1996
- Microwave endometrial ablation for menorrhagia: outcome at 2 years--experience of a district general hospital 2004
- Endometrial ablation: Post-operative pain, sonographic findings, management and outcome 1994
References (11)
- Endometrial ablation: Post-operative pain, sonographic findings, management and outcome via openalex
- Microwave endometrial ablation for menorrhagia: outcome at 2 years--experience of a district general hospital via openalex
- Post-ablation-tubal sterilization syndrome. via openalex
- Postablation-tubal sterilization syndrome via openalex
- W2053619114 via openalex
- W2075207173 via openalex
- W2097912527 via openalex
- W2125896089 via openalex
- W2033101412 via openalex
- W2037643368 via openalex
- W2052302383 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK