Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) for non-invasive diagnosis of rectosigmoidal endometriosis – a systematic review and meta-analysis
This systematic review and meta-analysis critically analyzed the diagnostic value of transvaginal sonography for non-invasive, presurgical detection of rectosigmoidal endometriosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper is a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) for the non-invasive, presurgical detection of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) involving the rectosigmoid bowel. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies using laparoscopy and/or histopathology as the reference standard, and 10 eligible studies (1106 patients with suspected endometriosis) were included; the authors recalculated likelihood ratios and pooled sensitivities/specificities. They found pooled sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 98%, with PPV and NPV of 98% and 95%, and positive/negative likelihood ratios of 30.36 and 0.09, though ranges and confidence intervals were wide, reflecting variability across studies. The paper reports that bowel preparation or contrast techniques may affect performance (e.g., negative LHR 0.04 for water contrast TVS vs 0.47 for TVS). This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for rectosigmoidal deep infiltrating endometriosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,653 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Objective
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00