Female with multiple groin pathologies: inguinal hernia containing fallopian tube, obturator hernia and subcutaneous endometrioma

article OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11

A case study describes a 39-year-old female with a painful left groin lump that, during laparoscopic repair, revealed an inguinal hernia with a fallopian tube, an obturator hernia, and a subcutaneous endometrioma.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 · read from full text

This case report describes a 39-year-old woman with a painful left groin lump whose intermittent pain worsened with walking and was associated with menstruation; she underwent ultrasound and MRI, followed by elective laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) mesh repair planned for an inguinal hernia. Intraoperatively, the surgeons found multiple concurrent pathologies: an incarcerated indirect inguinal hernia containing part of the left fallopian tube and fimbrial cyst, an ectopic subcutaneous inguinal endometrioma, and an occult left obturator hernia, and histopathology confirmed extensive endometriosis in the excised mass. The paper emphasizes diagnostic limitations of ultrasound and non-specific imaging in female groin masses, noting that occult hernias and overlapping differentials can be missed and that imaging may remain non-diagnostic even with MRI. Relevance to endometriosis: the report centers on a subcutaneous inguinal endometrioma confirmed as endometriosis and discusses female groin-mass differentials that include inguinal endometriosis, though it is primarily a surgical case of multiple groin pathologies rather than adenomyosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Groin lumps in females can be challenging due to unique anatomy and vast differential diagnostic pathologies. We report the case of a 39-year-old female presenting with a six-month history of painful left groin lump. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair showed an incarcerated left indirect inguinal hernia sac containing part of the left fallopian tube and fimbrial cyst, a left fat-containing obturator hernia and associated with ectopic subcutaneous inguinal endometrioma. The anatomical differences in women suggest that individualized preoperative imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging have a place before considering laparoscopic hernia repair, to successfully identify and synchronously treat any concomitant pathologies.
Full text 6,959 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 4 sections · click to expand

Case

A 39-year-old woman presented to a general practitioner with a painful left groin lump. She had experienced six months of intermittent left groin pain exacerbated by walking and associated with menstruation. Her past medical history included gestational diabetes mellitus and no previous surgery. She had no regular medications and was a non-smoker. She had a normal body mass index. On examination, there was a firm, non-reducible and tender left groin mass. The abdomen was otherwise soft and non-tender. There were no contralateral masses and no inguinal lymphadenopathy bilaterally. An ultrasound showed a 33 × 25 × 29-mm sized hypoechoic irregular area within the left groin with some increased vascularity. She was referred to a general surgeon. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a left-sided direct inguinal hernia containing omental fat with a hernial neck measuring 2 cm without lymphadenopathy. She was consented for an elective laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) mesh repair of symptomatic left inguinal hernia. Intraoperative findings included an incarcerated left indirect inguinal hernia sac containing part of the left fallopian tube and fimbrial cyst, an ectopic subcutaneous inguinal endometrioma and an incidental occult fat-containing left obturator hernia ( Fig. 1 ). Consistent with the senior surgeon’s approach, the hernias were reduced laparoscopically, including division of the round ligament, and a pre-shaped anatomical Parietex™ mesh was inserted covering all important structures from pubic symphysis towards the space of Bogros, and fixed with fibrin glue along its inferior border [ 5 ]. The subcutaneous endometrioma was excised through a separate 2-cm skin incision. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and she was discharged the following day. Histopathology of the subcutaneous mass confirmed extensive areas of endometriosis. The patient’s preoperative symptoms had resolved at two weeks and two months follow-up. Laparoscopic images demonstrating incarcerated left fallopian tube, left obturator hernia, microscopic endometrioma and Parietex™ mesh placement.

Conclusion

Females presenting with inguinal hernia may harbor multiple concomitant hernia defects, or other rarer groin pathologies. A sound understanding of reproductive anatomy and clinical imaging can guide surgeons to make better tailored decisions pre-operatively and utilize their technical skills to address the pathologies, preferably in a minimally invasive manner.

Discussion

Accurate preoperative diagnosis of groin masses in females can be a diagnostic challenge, yet important to guide management. These differences may be in part due to our selected understanding of groin hernias being predominantly derived from male cohorts given their lifetime risk is 27–43% compared to only 3–6% in females [ 6 ]. Females have differentials exclusive to their anatomy, including inguinal endometriosis, canal of Nück hydrocele, round ligament lipomas and varicosities. These can be clinically indistinguishable to commoner groin hernias on examination and less routinely considered given their paucity. Other key anatomical distinctions contribute to increased risk of specific pathologies including femoral hernias, related to the wider female pelvis and atrophy of an already smaller mass of protective muscle bulk, and also obturator hernias postulated to be a result of a more horizontal direction of the obturator canal [ 7 ]. A British study of 183 female groin hernia repairs demonstrated misdiagnosis in 18.3% [ 8 ]. Two other studies showed a significantly increased risk of incidental hernias found during laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery in females compared to males (29.2 vs 2.2%, and 37 vs 3%, respectively) [ 9 , 10 ]. Higher rates of hernia recurrence in females are also thought related to misdiagnosis of the primary pathology [ 3 ]. Differentiating between common and uncommon pathologies has implications for management (laparoscopic vs open) and the timing of surgery (emergency vs elective). The HerniaSurge Group advises supplementation of clinical examination with ultrasound in females with groin masses to improve pre-operative diagnosis [ 3 ]. Ultrasound can differentiate hernia from other pathologies and evaluate for hernia-related complications; however, findings can be non-specific, operator dependent and occult hernias can be missed, as in our case [ 11 ]. Where diagnostic uncertainty remains, MRI offers improved specificity in differentiating groin lumps with higher sensitivity than ultrasound or computed tomography (CT) [ 11 ]. MRI is the best diagnostic tool to diagnose musculoskeletal pathologies including adductor tendonitis, pubic osteitis or extrapelvic endometriosis, where identification of hemosiderin deposits is pathognomonic [ 11 , 12 ]. Access and costs of MRI are challenging, so CT can be utilized when ultrasound is negative and MRI is not available [ 3 ]. Nevertheless, imaging may remain non-diagnostic, as in this case of multiple pathologies. This is consistent with another case report of histologically proven subcutaneous inguinal endometrioma and inguinal hernia, where preoperative ultrasound and CT identified a right ovarian cyst and homogeneous hypoechoic lesion, without inguinal hernia [ 13 ]. The recommended surgical approach for females with groin hernias considers the challenge of preoperative diagnosis. A preperitoneal laparoscopic approach is recommended, setting up a thorough view of the myopectineal orifice, allowing for assessment of all hernial orifices [ 3 , 8 ]. Interestingly, other case reports describe an open approach in females with multiple concomitant groin pathologies, although these would not identify concomitant hernia or contralateral pathologies, unlike in this case [ 13–15 ]. We believe that routine laparoscopic TEP approach in females allows for better identification and appropriate management of multiple pathologies not identified preoperatively.

Introduction

A groin lump appearing as a swelling at the inguinofemoral junction is a common surgical presentation in general practice and emergency departments. The clinical features of a groin mass vary in size, shape, tenderness and consistency, reflecting various possible underlying pathological processes, including hernias, infection, neoplasms, vascular or congenital abnormalities [ 1 , 2 ]. Groin hernias occur 9–12 times more frequently in males and only 9% of all hernia operations occur in females [ 3 , 4 ]. Females have a unique set of diagnostic challenges due to anatomical differences compared to males, inconspicuous examination findings, and non-specific ultrasound imaging findings. We herein report the case of a 39-year-old female with a left groin lump, which revealed multiple concomitant pathologies intraoperatively including an incarcerated indirect inguinal hernia containing part of the left fallopian tube, subcutaneous inguinal endometrioma and an occult left obturator hernia.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometrioma

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (19)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-02T06:10:09.037253+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK