Cervix removal at the time of hysterectomy: factors affecting patients’ choice and effect on subsequent sexual function
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
Physicians' recommendations significantly influenced hysterectomy type choice, with cervix removal or retention showing no impact on sexual function after 15.2 months.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectivesTo identify factors that influence the decision-making process on the type of hysterectomy (total or supracervical) and the impact of surgery of subsequent sexual function.Study designA cross-sectional survey was undertaken on 212 women who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) or laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) for benign conditions at the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecology at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, MA, USA. We analyzed the factors that patients considered in their decision-making process, their sexual function after surgery and their satisfaction with the surgery overall. Demographic and perioperative outcomes were also collected.ResultsA total of 115 women answered the survey, for a response rate of 54.24%. The patients who underwent LSH (n=54) and TLH (n=61) were overall similar in terms of baseline factors and perioperative outcomes. Patients reported that the physician was the main source of information regarding decision to remove or retain the cervix (79.13%). The physicians' recommendation was viewed as very or extremely important (83.68%) to the decision-making process, followed by concerns regarding their future sex life (51.09%). Almost half of the women reported that hysterectomy had no impact on sexual function. No statistically significant differences were seen between groups regarding satisfaction with sexual function (p=.822), impact on sexual function (p=.753) or recommendation of this surgery to other women (p=.505).ConclusionConcerns about sexual health were important to women when considering the type of hysterectomy to undergo. Cervix removal or retention at the time of hysterectomy did not impact women's sexual function after mean follow-up of 15.2 months.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
- The Psychosocial Dimensions of Hysterectomy: Private Places and the Inner Spaces of Women at Midlife 2010
- Sexual Functioning Following Elective Hysterectomy: The Role of Surgical and Psychosocial Variables 2009
- Is cervix removal associated with patient-centered outcomes of pain, dyspareunia, well-being and satisfaction after laparoscopic hysterectomy? 2014
Cited by (2)
References (32)
- Is cervix removal associated with patient-centered outcomes of pain, dyspareunia, well-being and satisfaction after laparoscopic hysterectomy? via openalex
- Sexual Functioning Following Elective Hysterectomy: The Role of Surgical and Psychosocial Variables via openalex
- The Psychosocial Dimensions of Hysterectomy: Private Places and the Inner Spaces of Women at Midlife via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00229.x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000291564.32956.de via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00664-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.003 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/aogs.12220 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000000105 via openalex
- doi:10.3886/icpsr22745.v1 via openalex
- doi:10.1055/s-0034-1388581 via openalex
- W50126540 via openalex
- W1264843078 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.005 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.039 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00529-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.005 via openalex
- doi:10.3886/icpsr09521.v1 via openalex
- W6602026322 via openalex
- W6644446378 via openalex
- W6664315107 via openalex
- W6674763168 via openalex
- W6676399672 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejmoa013336 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000079 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3318-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-014-3569-x via openalex
- doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b13ca2 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/jsm.12623 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004993.pub2 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004993.pub3 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:03:29.626429+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK