Gynecologic Surgical Outcomes Through the Patient’s Eyes: Are Physicians Looking in the Same Direction?

In: Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2019 · vol. 74(6) , pp. 351–361 · doi:10.1097/ogx.0000000000000681 · PMID:31216044 · W2951709984
review OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-19

This review identifies key outcomes important to women undergoing benign gynecologic surgery and provides guidance for surgeons to incorporate these patient preferences into shared decision-making for improved satisfaction.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Patient-centered care integrates the highest clinical standards with patient preferences surrounding their treatment. Increasing focus is being placed on the identification of patient-centered outcomes to optimize the impact of medical treatments on patient quality of life, as defined by patients themselves. OBJECTIVE: This article will review the central concepts of patient-centered outcomes in benign gynecologic surgery. This expert review will serve as a practical guide for surgeons to incorporate patient preferences into shared surgical decision making. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The current literature is examined, defining those outcomes identified by women undergoing gynecologic procedures as the most important factors in their decision making. Available literature on these patient-identified priorities is then reviewed with respect to gynecologic surgery in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. RESULTS: Each section of the article concludes with Clinical Pearls, where practical tools and key elements are summarized to assist providers with incorporating these concepts into practice. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Many key outcomes have been identified by women undergoing benign gynecologic surgery in their decision-making process. Patient counseling should address clinically appropriate treatment modalities and include an exploration of patient expectations and preferences around nonclinical outcomes as well. This shared decision-making model will result in improved satisfaction with outcomes.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (61)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-13T19:46:01.794608+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK