Gynaecological symptoms and psychological distress in potential hysterectomy patients

Observational OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 9 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study investigated gynaecological symptoms and psychological distress in patients considering a hysterectomy, aiming to understand their interrelationships and identify contributing factors.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The association between psychological and gynaecological problems has long been recognised and has recently received empirical support. The association of gynaecological symptoms with anxiety and depression was investigated. One hundred and two women referred to a gynaecology clinic, for non-malignant problems likely to result in hysterectomy, were assessed. A scale of gynaecological symptoms was constructed using principal component analysis. The Kellner-Sheffield Self-Rating Scale of Distress and the Zung Self-Rating Scale of Depression were also used. The depression measure correlated with complaints of heavy bleeding, flooding and clotting. The anxiety measure correlated with the complaint of long-standing painful menstruation. Anxiety and depression levels were significantly greater in this group than in an age-related population sample of women taken from the same city. It is argued that the use of such a scale of gynaecological symptoms might aid prediction of psychological difficulty in those presenting with certain gynaecological complaints.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Genital Diseases, Female Hysterectomy Psychophysiologic Disorders Adult Anxiety Disorders Anxiety Disorders Depressive Disorder Depressive Disorder Female Genital Diseases, Female Humans Hysterectomy Middle Aged Psychological Tests Psychophysiologic Disorders Sick Role

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (27)

Cited by (8)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:48:32.119780+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK