Comparison of 2-, 3D and doppler ultrasound with histological findings in adenomyosis
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This study compared 2D, 3D, and Doppler ultrasound findings against histological diagnoses to evaluate their accuracy in identifying adenomyosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
Cited by (5)
- Modern methods for radiological diagnosis of endometriosis 2020
- CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES OF RADIOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS OF ADENOMYOSIS IN REPRODUCTIVE LOSSES 2019
- Ultrasound studies of the endometrial-myometrial junction for the diagnosis of adenomyosis and endometrial cancer 2014
- The endometrial-myometrial junction: a fresh look at a busy crossing 2009
- Adenomyosis uteri: an update 2009
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK