Comparison of 2-, 3D and doppler ultrasound with histological findings in adenomyosis
article
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This study compared 2D, 3D, and Doppler ultrasound findings against histological diagnoses to evaluate their accuracy in identifying adenomyosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
Cited by (5)
- Modern methods for radiological diagnosis of endometriosis 2020
- CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES OF RADIOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS OF ADENOMYOSIS IN REPRODUCTIVE LOSSES 2019
- Ultrasound studies of the endometrial-myometrial junction for the diagnosis of adenomyosis and endometrial cancer 2014
- The endometrial–myometrial junction: a fresh look at a busy crossing 2009
- Adenomyosis uteri: an update 2009
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK