Kill two birds with one stone: Flexible cholangioscopy for treatment of common bile duct stone and identification of suspicious gallbladder wall thickening

Endoscopy · 2024 · vol. 56(S 01) , pp. E358–E359 · doi:10.1055/a-2299-2307 · PMID:38657670 · PMC11042877
Case report OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash+body, 2026-08-23 ⓘ

A flexible cholangioscopy enabled simultaneous common bile duct stone extraction and targeted gallbladder biopsy, leading to the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in a patient with suspected gallbladder adenomyosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-23 · read from full text ⓘ

This case report describes a 76-year-old man presenting with recurrent abdominal pain, where imaging identified a common bile duct stone and suspicious gallbladder wall thickening. The medical team utilized flexible cholangioscopy to successfully extract the bile duct stone and subsequently access the gallbladder lumen for direct visualization and targeted biopsies of a papillary neoplasm. Pathological analysis confirmed high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, which was later verified as highly differentiated adenocarcinoma following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Relevance to endometriosis: The paper mentions gallbladder adenomyosis only as an initial differential diagnosis for wall thickening before confirming malignancy; it does not discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis in the context of gynecological disease.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 3,419 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 1 sections · click to expand

Section

A 76-year-old man suffered from recurrent abdominal pain and distention. The contract-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) exams revealed the presence of a stone in common bile duct (CBD) ( Fig. 1 a ) and concerning evidence of gallbladder wall thickening, suggestive of either gallbladder adenomyosis or gallbladder carcinoma ( Fig. 1 b , c ). In order to distinguish benign adenomyosis from malignant carcinoma, together with treatment of the CBD stone, we sequentially performed endoscopic basket retrieval and target biopsies of the gallbladder. a Endoscopic ultrasound showed the stone in the common bile duct (CBD) (red circle). b Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography revealed the contrast-enhanced localized thickening of the gallbladder wall (red arrows). c The localized contrast-enhanced gallbladder wall thickness as shown in the endoscopic ultrasound image (red circle). In the first procedure, contrast imaging revealed CBD dilation ( Fig. 2 a ). Under the navigation of the guidewire, the cholangioscope was introduced into the CBD and the stone was then successfully extracted ( Fig. 2 b ). Subsequently, another guidewire was advanced into the gallbladder lumen under the guidance of the cholangioscope ( Fig. 2 c ), facilitating the subsequent placement of the stent along the segment extending from the gallbladder to Vater’s ampulla, creating an approach for subsequent cholangioscopy during the second procedure ( Fig. 2 d ). Meanwhile, a double-pigtail stent was deployed within the CBD to ensure fluent bile drainage. a Cholangiography showed the dilation of CBD. b The stone was extracted by the retrieval basket. c The guidewire was advanced into the gallbladder lumen under direct vision of the cholangioscope. d Cholangiography showed the placement of the metal stent and double-pigtail stent. Three days later, we performed the second endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The cholangioscope entered the gallbladder along the formally established pathway under the guidance of the guidewire. Owing to the excellent dexterity of the cholangioscope, retroflexion can be achieved in the constricted gallbladder lumen, so that we could directly observe the multifocal papillary neoplasm at the gallbladder neck ( Fig. 3 a , b ). Subsequently, target biopsies were taken and then pathology confirmed high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Stents were removed during duodenoscope withdrawal ( Fig. 3 c , d ; Video 1 ). a Multifocal irregular papillary proliferations were observed at the gallbladder neck in retroflexion. b Contrast imaging presented the cholangioscope in the retroflex position. c Target biopsies were taken by forceps. d Contrast imaging presented the process of the biopsy. Cholangioscopy-guided stone extraction and biopsy. Video 1 The patient then underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative histopathology confirmed the presence of highly differentiated gallbladder adenocarcinoma. As this case shows, while gallbladder neoplasms can be easily detected by US or CT, making a pathological diagnosis in the early stage remains challenging, often necessitating endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) 1 . This case suggests a potential option for early precise diagnosis of a gallbladder neoplasm. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AR_2AD

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

MeSH descriptors

Gallbladder Gallbladder Gallbladder Gallbladder Aged Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Choledocholithiasis Choledocholithiasis Endoscopy, Digestive System Endoscopy, Digestive System Endoscopy, Digestive System Gallstones Gallstones Gallstones Humans Male

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:43:52.436432+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Per Europe PMC