Comparison of clinical pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates in frozen vs selective fresh embryo transfers: a multicentric retrospective analysis

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025 · vol. 15(1) , pp. 144–148 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20254274 · W7117583395
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06

This multicentric retrospective analysis found frozen embryo transfers yielded better clinical pregnancy rates than fresh transfers, especially in endometriosis and male factor infertility, but also showed higher miscarriage rates overall, except in endometriosis patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

This multicentric retrospective analysis compared clinical pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates between frozen and selective fresh embryo transfers across 65 centers, using IVF cycles from 2019–2023. It included self-cycles in an antagonist protocol with one or two blastocysts and excluded individuals with severe uterine factor infertility (including severe adenomyosis), multiple prior IVF failures, or bad obstetric history (three or more pregnancy losses). Overall, frozen transfers had higher clinical pregnancy rates than fresh transfers, while miscarriage rates were higher with frozen transfers except in subgroup analyses for endometriosis, and the paper reports especially favorable pregnancy outcomes for endometriosis and male factor infertility. This paper directly contributes to endometriosis research by reporting frozen-vs-fresh outcomes in an endometriosis subgroup, and it also discusses adenomyosis only as an exclusion criterion rather than as a study focus.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: IVF initially involved making of embryos and transferring in same cycle. However, with advanced freezing techniques, most of the clinics now have shifted to freeze all strategy claiming better pregnancy rates. Our study aims to compare clinical outcomes in frozen vs. selective fresh transfers. We also compared clinical outcomes in these groups in subgroups of PCOS, Poor reserve, tubal factor, endometriosis and male factor. Methods: Multicentric, retrospective study conducted across 65 centers. The IVF cycles were included for a period of 5 years from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2023. Sub fertile couples between 23 to 43 years of age undergoing self-cycles in antagonist protocol, undergoing embryo transfer with one or two blastocysts. Patients with severe uterine factor infertility (multiple fibroids, unicornuate uterus, Asherman’s syndrome, and severe adenomyosis), patient who had history of previous three or more IVF failure (recurrent implantation failure), patients with bad obstetric history (three or more pregnancy losses) were excluded. Results: Total number of embryo transfers were 38,789. Frozen transfers were 34,407 and 4382 were fresh embryo transfer. Only those patients which had clinically low risk of OHSS and good endometrial thickness with trilaminar appearance were considered for fresh embryo transfers. Clinical pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates were calculated in both the groups. Further, the clinical pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates were also calculated in subgroups like PCOS group (n=3341), tubal factor (n=1929) endometriosis (n=693), low ovarian reserve (n=863) and male factor infertility (n=31963). Conclusions: Our study showed better pregnancy rates with frozen embryo transfers over fresh embryo transfers, more so in endometriosis and male factor infertility. However, even miscarriage rates are higher in frozen embryo transfer except in endometriosis patients.
Full text 5,293 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

IVF initially involved making of embryos and transferring in same cycle. However, with advanced freezing techniques, most of the clinics now have shifted to freeze all strategy claiming better pregnancy rates. Our study aims to compare clinical outcomes in frozen vs. selective fresh transfers. We also compared clinical outcomes in these groups in subgroups of PCOS, Poor reserve, tubal factor, endometriosis and male factor.

Methods

Multicentric, retrospective study conducted across 65 centers. The IVF cycles were included for a period of 5 years from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2023. Sub fertile couples between 23 to 43 years of age undergoing self-cycles in antagonist protocol, undergoing embryo transfer with one or two blastocysts. Patients with severe uterine factor infertility (multiple fibroids, unicornuate uterus, Asherman’s syndrome, and severe adenomyosis), patient who had history of previous three or more IVF failure (recurrent implantation failure), patients with bad obstetric history (three or more pregnancy losses) were excluded.

Results

Total number of embryo transfers were 38,789. Frozen transfers were 34,407 and 4382 were fresh embryo transfer. Only those patients which had clinically low risk of OHSS and good endometrial thickness with trilaminar appearance were considered for fresh embryo transfers. Clinical pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates were calculated in both the groups. Further, the clinical pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates were also calculated in subgroups like PCOS group (n=3341), tubal factor (n=1929) endometriosis (n=693), low ovarian reserve (n=863) and male factor infertility (n=31963).

Conclusions

Our study showed better pregnancy rates with frozen embryo transfers over fresh embryo transfers, more so in endometriosis and male factor infertility. However, even miscarriage rates are higher in frozen embryo transfer except in endometriosis patients. Metrics

References

Biggers JD. IVF and embryo transfer: historical origin and development. Reproduct Biomed Online. 2012;25(2):118-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.04.011 Schiewe MC, Anderson RE. Vitrification: the pioneering past to current trends and perspectives of cryopreserving human embryos, gametes and reproductive tissue. J Bioreposit Sci Appli Medi. 2017;5:57-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/BSAM.S139376 Devroey P, Polyzos NP, Blockeel C. An OHSS-Free Clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment. Human Reproduct. 2011;26(10):2593-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der251 Foroozanfard F, Moraveji SA, Taghavi SA, Karimi F. Association between serum estradiol level on the day of hCG administration and IVF-ICSI outcome. J Obstetr Gynecol India. 2016;66(3):170-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0687-8 Gullo G, Basile G, Cucinella G, Greco ME, Perino A, Chiantera V, et al. Fresh vs. frozen embryo transfer in assisted reproductive techniques: a single center retrospective cohort study and ethical-legal implications. Euro Revi Medi Pharmacolog Sci. 2023;27(14):6809-23. Wong KM, Van Wely M, Verhoeve HR, Kaaijk EM, Mol F, Van der Veen F, et al. Transfer of fresh or frozen embryos: a randomised controlled trial. Human Reproduct. 2021;36(4):998-1006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa305 Zaat T, Zagers M, Mol F, Goddijn M, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochr Datab Systemat Revi. 2021(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub3 Wang A, Santistevan A, Cohn KH, Copperman A, Nulsen J, Miller BT, et al. Freeze-only versus fresh embryo transfer in a multicenter matched cohort study: contribution of progesterone and maternal age to success rates. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(2):254-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.007 Zuo L, Fan Y, Ai J, Tian L. Analysis of factors related to early miscarriage after in vitro fertilization embryo transfer. Gynecol Obstetr Clin Medi. 2022;2(4):171-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gocm.2022.09.001 Chang Y, Shen M, Wang S, Li X, Duan H. Association of embryo transfer type with infertility in endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reproduct Genet. 2022;39(5):1033-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02460-w Tan J, Cerrillo M, Cruz M, Cecchino GN, Garcia-Velasco JA. Early pregnancy outcomes in fresh versus deferred embryo transfer cycles for endometriosis-associated infertility: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Medi. 20218;10(2):344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020344 Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N EnglJ Medi. 2016;375(6):523-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1513873 Stormlund S, Sopa N, Zedeler A, Bogstad J, Prætorius L, Nielsen HS, et al. Freeze-all versus fresh blastocyst transfer strategy during in vitro fertilisation in women with regular menstrual cycles: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2020;370:m2519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2519

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisadenomyosisinfertility

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

References (12)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK