Discriminating power of CPPQ‐Mohedo: a new questionnaire for chronic pelvic pain
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
The CPPQ-Mohedo questionnaire demonstrated strong discriminating power for chronic pelvic pain in both men and women, comparable to the NIH-CPSI but with fewer items.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In the absence of a gold-standard tool to measure chronic pelvic pain (CPP), most studies on the prevalence of CPP use the NIH-chronic prostatitis symptom index (CPSI) questionnaire. However, its suitability and relevance for use in both sexes have not yet been evaluated, and generalized interpretation of the results is therefore questionable. Accordingly, we designed a questionnaire that discriminates between patients with and without symptoms of CPP. METHODS: We undertook a study to test the discriminating capacity for chronic pelvic pain questionnaire (CPPQ)-Mohedo test for CPP among healthy and unhealthy individuals, and if this discrimination was similar for men and women. We did a matched study - 40 unhealthy men were matched by age with 40 unhealthy women - and each of those was matched with six healthy controls by age and sex (480 in total). To elaborate the questionnaire (CPPQ-Mohedo), we started with the NIH-CPSI, adapting the items referring to anatomic areas for women, changing the type of response and including various items on pelvic pain not previously recorded. RESULTS: The NIH-CPSI questionnaire [area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC curve), 0.946] was very similar to that of the CPPQ-Mohedo questionnaire (area under the ROC curve, 0.968), but the first required more items. CPPQ-Mohedo showed similar discriminant capacity between men and women. The dimensions involved (pain and quality of life) showed internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The CPPQ-Mohedo questionnaire presented discriminating power in men and women with symptoms of CPP. This questionnaire may be used as a screening tool to identify patients and include them in treatment programmes, as an outcome assessment tool for treatment and clinical trials, or as a tool to assess the prevalence of CPP in epidemiologic studies.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (22)
- A cognitive behavioural based assessment of women with chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Causes of chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Chronic pelvic pain in New Zealand: prevalence, pain severity, diagnoses and use of the health services via openalex
- Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women in New Zealand: Comparative Well-Being, Comorbidity, and Impact on Work and Other Activities via openalex
- Chronic Pelvic Pain: Prevalence, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Economic Correlates via openalex
- Epidemiology of chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Physical therapy in the management of women with chronic pelvic pain via openalex
- Prevalence and correlates of three types of pelvic pain in a nationally representative sample of Australian women via openalex
- Prevalence and incidence of chronic pelvic pain in primary care: evidence from a national general practice database via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.08.027 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000158445.68149.38 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s11934-004-0057-z via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.2005.05684.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.046 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65678-9 via openalex
- doi:10.2164/jandrol.04159 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.08.028 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejmcp060423 via openalex
- W2355385538 via openalex
- W6672155593 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.043 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.073 via openalex
Cited by (4)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:58:56.137231+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK