Spontaneous pregnancy following intra-ovarian platelet-rich plasma administration in poor ovarian responders according to the POSEIDON criteria: A cross-sectional study

other OA: gold public-domain-us

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Female infertility, especially in those individuals with poor ovarian response (POR), is a challenge in the field of infertility and sterility. Recently, intra-ovarian platelet-rich plasma (IO-PRP) administration has been suggested as a possible co-treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the biodemographic characteristics of individuals who experienced spontaneous pregnancy following IO-PRP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, out of 1548 women diagnosed with POR who underwent IO-PRP, 596 individuals who completed their 2-yr follow-up period, were included. Different types of demographic and pre-intervention laboratory data (blood levels of anti-Müllerian hormone, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol, prolactin, and their spouses' sperm analysis results) were collected from the files. Each individual was classified into a certain group according to the POSEIDON criteria, and their data were compared. RESULTS: The results showed that 50 (8.39%) spontaneous pregnancies were observed. However, 8 were excluded from further analyses due to missing data in their critical variables. The most prevalent POSEIDON group was 4, with a prevalence of 17/42 (40.47%). Among the POSEIDON groups, covariates including the age of the individuals and their spouses, body mass index, anti-Müllerian hormone, and antral follicle/oocytes count following the latest IO-PRP significantly differed (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.039, p < 0.001, and p = 0.022, respectively). CONCLUSION: The spontaneous pregnancy rate following IO-PRP among women with POR was low. However, significant differences in biodemographic and hormonal characteristics were observed between the groups with and without spontaneous pregnancy which could be useful in leading future studies on this subject.
Full text 16,093 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 2 sections · click to expand

Section

M. Sanuie Farimani and R. Anvari Aliabad had full access to all of the data in the study and took responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Concept and design: M. Sanuie Farimani and R. Anvari Aliabad. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data K. Amiri and R. Anvari Aliabad. Drafting of the manuscript: K. Amiri and R. Anvari Aliabad. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors. Statistical analysis: K. Amiri. Supervision: M. Sanuie Farimani and R. Anvari Aliabad.

Coi Statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-16T09:21:09.727480+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-19T06:04:46.023267+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine