Effect of one session of tDCS on the severity of pain in women with chronic pelvic pain

In: Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies · 2017 · vol. 23(3) , pp. 678–682 · doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.12.014 · PMID:31563388 · W2778084809
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-19

This study found that one session of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduced pain and improved quality of life and disability in women with chronic pelvic pain.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

AimThe present study aimed to investigate the effects of tDCS on pain score in women with Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP).Materials & methodsA total of 16 women with CPP participated in the present double-blind sham-controlled cross-over study. Each participant received a 20-min 0.3 MA of trans Cranial Direct Stimulation (tDCS) with a current density of 0.1 mA/cm2. In addition to the pain intensity, the Quality of Life (QOL), disability, and depression statuses were assessed prior to and one week after the treatment. Shapiro-Wilks goodness-of-fit test for normality, dependent t-Test, and Wilcoxon Signed- Rank Test were used for data analysis. Values of p < .05 were considered statistically significant.FindingsActive tDCS treatment was effective in the reduction of pain (p = .0001), improving QOL (208.938 > 193.313, P = .025), and the disability (22.375 < 30.375, P = .025). The results showed no effect of active or sham treatment on the depression (p ≥ .05).ConclusionThe positive effects of active tDCS on CPP suggest the need to study the effect of this method on other types of chronic pain.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (59)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK