Results
A total of 23 women were screened for eligibility, and 12 were enrolled. Reasons for screen failure included current breastfeeding status, being more than 12 weeks past primary CIN2/3 treatment, among others. Participant baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1 . The mean age was 43.9 years (SD 4.4, range 34–49). Seven (58.3%) had a primary education or less as the highest level of education attained. Only three (25.0%) were formally employed, while the rest were farmers (4, 33.3%), self-employed (2, 16.7%), or unemployed (3, 25.0%). Five (41.7%) participants were married, and all 12 had a monthly income of less than KShs 25 000 (~USD 120). Participant income was 20% higher than the average monthly income per capita in Kenya. 20 All participants were on antiretroviral therapy with a median CD4 count of 781 cells/mm 3 (IQR 418–890). Study uptake was 100.0% as every eligible participant offered enrollment agreed to enroll. All 12 participants started and completed all study visits. Nine (75.0%) of the participants elected to use the first dose of 5FU in the clinic under the observation of a study nurse. All participants used all eight 5FU doses per protocol. 5FU use was delayed for 1 week in one participant due to bothersome itching and burning sensation on urination associated with a grade 1 AE.
The type, frequency, and severity of participant-reported AEs are summarized in Table 2 . All 12 participants reported at least one grade I AE, one (8.3%) reported a grade 2 AE and no grade 3 or 4 AEs were reported. The most common AEs were grade 1 vaginal discharge in nine (75.0%) and grade 1 pelvic pain in seven (58.3%) participants, with a mean duration of 3.2 and 2.1 days, respectively, all self-limited. One participant (8.3%) reported grade 2 pelvic pain, which caused greater than minimal interference with daily activities and required non-narcotic medication. Of note, this participant reported pelvic pain at baseline (before 5FU initiation), which started after her excision procedure. Adverse events noted on pelvic examinations during follow-up visits are listed in Table 3 . The most common was discharge in eight (66.7%, 95% CI: 34.9%–90.0%) and cervical erythema in six (50%, 95% CI: 21.1%–78.9%), all grade 1 (mild to moderate increase in discharge without pooling or erythema covering <50% of the cervix). Four participants, 33.3% (95% CI: 9.9%–65.1%), had grade 1 vaginal abrasions noted on examination, all superficial disruptions of the epithelium, measuring 0.5–1 cm, with little to no mucosal involvement. All abrasions resolved with perineal care, which included the use of a peri bottle during urination and the application of an occlusive moisturizer (Vaseline) to the affected area. One participant delayed the next dose of 5FU to ensure complete healing. No participant stopped 5FU use or did not complete the planned eight doses due to a lack of resolution of an abrasion. All participants tolerated all eight 5FU doses, and the majority of participants reported using tampons after each 5FU application. All five participants who had a male partner endorsed adherence to the recommendation of maintaining abstinence for 2 days after 5FU use.
On adherence assessment, evidence of 5FU use was supported by at least one of three methods for all 96 (100%) doses among the 12 participants. Four (4.2%) instances of 5FU use were not supported by one of three adherence assessment methods. In all four instances, the change in weight deviated slightly from what was expected, often a bit lower, and in two instances, the change in weight was higher than expected. In both cases, the participant endorsed spillage of cream when loading onto the applicator, and inspection of the returned applicator was consistent with streaking to the 2 g mark, as expected. Hence, overuse was unlikely. Using all three methods to evaluate adherence, 96% of 5FU doses were used correctly. No participant was discontinued from the study because of non-compliance with the protocol.
Materials
We conducted a prospective single-arm, phase 1 pilot study among 12 WLWH at Lumumba Sub-County Hospital in Kisumu, Kenya, between March 10, 2023, and February 15, 2024. The study was approved by the institutional review boards at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (21–3265) and the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI/SERU/CMR/4555). All participants provided informed consent.
The study protocol is published 15 and the study flow diagram is shown in Figure 1 . 15 Participants were WLWH aged 18–49 years, with biopsy-confirmed CIN2/3, within 4–12 weeks of primary treatment and agreed to use dual contraception if of childbearing age. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy or breastfeeding, use of high-dose steroids, or prior history of cervical cancer. After informed consent, medical history and eligibility criteria, baseline cervical images, and specimens for sexually transmitted infections (STI) and CD4 count testing were obtained. Participants diagnosed with STIs were offered treatment before enrollment. Participants attended an enrollment visit within 28 days of the screening visit(s) and received detailed counseling in the participant’s preferred language, usually Dholuo , on how to self-administer 5FU as outlined in Box 1 using pictorial aids and a pelvic model. Study participants were instructed to self-administer 2 g of 5% 5FU cream (Effudex, Bausch Health, USA) intravaginally using an applicator biweekly (every 2 weeks) at night for eight doses. Participants were given the option to self-administer the first dose of 5FU in the clinic and the rest at home. Literate participants recorded date of cream use and adverse events in a study diary, while a nurse called non-literate participants weekly for this information. 5FU use was postponed if it coincided with the participant’s menstrual cycle or in cases of vaginal and vulvar abrasions. Sexual abstinence was required for 48 h after each 5FU application.
Participants returned to the study clinic 1 week after each application for safety and adherence assessments and pregnancy testing. Adverse events (AEs) were reviewed from the study diaries, interviews, and pelvic examinations, which included a speculum examination. These events were graded using the standardized Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Adverse Events for Female Microbicide Trials. 16 Three methods from previous microbicide trials 17 were used to evaluate adherence: (1) self-report (verbal or study diary), (2) weighing of study tubes at each visit to document appropriate decreasing weight, and (3) visual inspection of returned applicators for evidence of study drug ( Figure S1 ). A participant was considered adherent to a specific 5FU dose if all three assessment methods confirmed its use. At week 16, acceptability was assessed through a questionnaire and an in-depth interview. Delayed adverse events were elicited at the final study visit on week 20. All participants were advised to follow up for repeat cervical cancer screening at 12 months after their primary treatment, as is the standard of care in Kenya. 18 Participants received a Kenya Shilling 1000 (U.S. $10) travel stipend and a meal voucher for each visit.
The primary endpoint of safety was evaluated by the type, frequency, severity, and duration of both reported and clinician-observed AEs during the trial, including 95% confidence intervals. The at-risk period for safety began at study week 1 (after the first week of 5FU use) and continued through study week 20 (4 weeks after the last 5FU use). Secondary endpoints were: (1) uptake, defined as the proportion of eligible screened participants who agreed to participate in the trial; (2) tolerability, defined as the proportion of participants who were unable or unwilling to apply at least four of eight 5FU doses due to adverse events or burden of self-application and (3) adherence. The study aimed to evaluate safety, specifically powered to exclude grade 3 or worse AEs, as is expected based on prior studies of intravaginal 5FU at this dose and frequency. With a sample size of 12 and assuming no grade 3 or worse AEs occur, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the AE rate would be 26.5%. 19 This means we can confidently rule out occurrence of grade 3 or worse AEs in 26.5% of the population. All analyses were conducted using Stata version 15 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, USA).
Discussion
In this phase I trial, adjuvant, self-administered, intravaginal 5%FU cream following primary CIN2/3 treatment among WLWH in Kenya was safe, tolerable, and associated with high adherence. All study participants tolerated all eight 5FU doses with no discontinuation due to primarily grade 1AEs, and 96% of 5FU doses were used correctly based on three methods of adherence assessments. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating these endpoints in a LMIC.
To achieve the WHO global cervical cancer elimination target of 90% of those with cervical precancer adequately treated by 2030, innovative, feasible, and scalable strategies are urgently needed in LMICs. Current precancer treatment gaps in LMICs include high precancer treatment failure rates among WLWH, as well as the inability of screen-positive women to access current provider-administered treatments. In Malawi, which has the world’s highest mortality from cervical cancer, between 2011 and 2015, only 43.3% and 31.8% of women with precancer who required cryotherapy or excision, respectively, received treatment. 21 Similarly, in Kenya, a middle-income African country, linkage to treatment among those who screened positive was below 40% between 2011 and 2020. 22 Evidence of the efficacy of intravaginal 5FU as a primary cervical precancer treatment includes a randomized U.S. trial where women with CIN2 had 93% regression rate at 6-month, compared to 56% randomized to observation ( P < 0.01). 13 Such outcomes, if demonstrated in LMICs through repurposing 5FU as a self-administered primary precancer treatment, may be transformative in reaching millions of women unable to access provider-administered treatment.
Self-administered intravaginal 5FU as adjuvant therapy following primary treatment could also improve precancer treatment outcomes in WLWH in LMICs who face 25%–30% CIN2/3 recurrence after treatment. 4 , 7 A U.S. randomized trial of self-administered 5FU as adjuvant therapy after CIN2/3 treatment among WLWH using the same 5FU protocol as our study demonstrated 8% recurrence at 18 months, compared to 31% in the observational arm. 12 Mixed methods studies in Kenya have demonstrated high acceptability of self-administered therapies among both women 23 , 24 and their male partners. 25 , 26
Early 5FU treatment regimens were associated with severe side effects, including chronic vaginal ulcerations, often associated with daily or twice daily application for multiple days at a time, 27 which deterred its use. However, the recent studies described above limiting 5FU use to less frequent applications demonstrate an acceptable side effect profile, consistent with our findings. In our study, the most notable AE was minor vaginal abrasions noted on the examination on four (33.3%, 95% CI: 9.9%–65.1%) participants. These were all grade 1 superficial epithelial disruptions with little to no mucosal involvement, which were self-limited and managed conservatively with a peri bottle to reduce discomfort with urination and a topical occlusive barrier (Vaseline) for comfort. In one participant, the next 5FU dose was delayed by 1 week to ensure healing. In a recent U.S. feasibility trial of alternating 5FU and imiquimod for primary CIN2/3 treatment, two (15.4%) had grade 1 and two (15.4%) grade 2 vaginal abrasions, defined as size <1 cm, all of which resolved spontaneously. 28
Our findings of a slightly higher rate of vaginal abrasions may be related to our study population being older and perimenopausal (mean age of 43.9 years), compared to a mean age of 27 years in the U.S. study. It is reassuring that all abrasions in our study were grade 1, self-limited, and did not interfere with daily activities. Similar to a recent study of intravaginal 5FU for vaginal precancer, 11 we recommended the use of an occlusive emollient cream to the external genitalia before and for 2–3 days after 5FU use for barrier protection. Larger studies of self-administered 5FU in LMICs can investigate the frequency of this AE, as well as its impact, if any, on HIV genital shedding among users. Future studies can investigate whether a lower dose (e.g., 1 g instead of 2 g) or fewer applications may reduce abrasions, particularly in menopausal women.
The strengths of the present study were its use of a standardized scale to evaluate safety, the frequency of study visits (every 2 weeks), and no loss-to-follow-up, limiting ascertainment bias. Additionally, adherence was evaluated using three different methods, increasing validity. Limitations of this study include a small sample size, which may reduce generalizability. Future studies with larger samples could help address these limitations. Future studies can evaluate the acceptability of these therapies among study participants, their partners, and healthcare stakeholders.
In summary, this study demonstrates that self-administered intravaginal 5FU, as adjuvant therapy among African women with CIN2/3 following primary treatment, was safe, well tolerated, and associated with very high adherence rates. Over half of the participants in our study had an eighth-grade education or less, and the majority had no electricity or tap water in their homes. Our finding of high safety and adherence in this population suggests that topical therapies like 5FU can be safely used in rural African settings, where access to provider-administered precancer therapy is limited. Randomized efficacy trials are needed to investigate whether adjuvant 5FU can improve precancer treatment outcomes among WLWH in LMICs or be used as a primary therapy to address current gaps. An effective self-administered topical therapy for cervical precancer in LMICs may be transformative and save millions of lives.
Introduction
Cervical cancer is largely preventable, yet in 2020, 85% of the 604 000 new cases and 90% of deaths occurred in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). 1 Women living with HIV (WLWH), the majority of whom reside in LMICs, face a six-fold higher risk of cervical cancer. 2 The limited availability of screening and treatment for precancerous lesions in LMICs drives this disparity. Achieving the WHO 2030 cervical cancer elimination targets, including treating 90% of those with precancer or cancer, 3 requires prioritizing improved treatment of precancerous lesions in WLWH. In LMICs, cervical precancer in WLWH is treated with ablation or excision, but both are limited by high recurrence rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3 (CIN2/3). Randomized trials in WLWH in South Africa and Kenya report CIN2/3 recurrence rates of 18%–19% after excision and 27%–30% after cryotherapy, 4 , 5 while thermal ablation shows CIN2/3 recurrence rates of 28% 6 –39.9% 6 , 7 within 1–3 years. Innovative yet feasible and accessible strategies like adjuvant topical therapies, immunotherapy, or therapeutic vaccinations are needed to improve these outcomes.
The antimetabolite and cytotoxic drug 5% fluorouracil (5FU), used in various precancerous and malignant skin conditions, 8 has shown tolerability and efficacy in high-income settings (HICs) for treatment of genital warts, 9 vulvar, 10 and vaginal 11 precancers. Randomized trials in HICs have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of self-administered, intravaginal 5FU cream for cervical precancer. 12 , 13 However, no studies have evaluated the feasibility of repurposing topical 5FU—an affordable, generic drug on the WHO List of Essential Medications 14 —for cervical precancer treatment in WLWH in LMICs. The WHO Essential Medications List comprises of drugs that meet critical healthcare needs and are meant to be consistently available in functioning health systems, ensuring their availability in most settings. To address this gap, we conducted a phase I pilot study in Kenya to evaluate the safety, uptake, tolerability, and adherence to self-administered intravaginal 5FU as adjuvant therapy following primary CIN2/3 treatment among WLWH.
Supplementary Material
Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of this article.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.