Comparative cultural characteristics of endometrial and endometriosis cells
Normal endometrial cell cultures were epithelioid, while endometriosis cell cultures more frequently had mixed populations, and progestin treatment showed no clear differences in endometriosis cell growth or morphology.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper compared the cultured cell characteristics of endometrial tissue and cells from a focus of endometriosis obtained from 35 women, with cultures developed for both tissue types and, in some cases, evaluated before and after treatment with synthetic progestins. Normal endometrial cultures were reported to consist more often of epithelioid cells, while cultures from endometriosis foci more frequently showed mixed cell populations. In internal endometriosis, cultures assessed before and after treatment with infecudin showed no clear differences in cell growth and morphology, and endometriosis-affected cells exhibited low mitotic activity that made karyotyping difficult. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it directly develops and compares culture characteristics of endometrial versus endometriosis cells and examines effects of progestin and infecudin treatment on those cultures.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
2,253 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (2)
References (10)
- W1524822829 via openalex
- W1732064447 via openalex
- W2036606439 via openalex
- W2042310122 via openalex
- W2069011282 via openalex
- W2399467200 via openalex
- W2405980733 via openalex
- W2422681091 via openalex
- W2468521464 via openalex
- W6832611370 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00