Co-administration of GnRH agonists with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle: An RCT

RCT OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-22 ⓘ

This randomized controlled trial found that co-administering GnRH agonists with vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles significantly improved clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates compared to using vaginal progesterone alone.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-04 · read from full text ⓘ

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of adding GnRH agonist to vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in women undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer. The study included 240 infertile women with various causes of infertility, explicitly excluding those with endometriosis stages III and IV. Results indicated that co-administration of GnRH agonist significantly improved clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates compared to progesterone alone, without affecting implantation or abortion rates. Relevance to endometriosis: The paper excludes patients with endometriosis from its analysis, meaning it does not provide data on this condition but rather focuses on other infertility etiologies.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since progesterone alone does not seem to be enough for luteal phase support (LPS), especially in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles, so gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is suggested as an adjuvant therapy in combination with progesterone for LPS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of the administration of GnRH-a with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone alone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 240 infertile women who were candidates for FET were evaluated into two groups (n = 120/each). Group I received 400 mg vaginal progesterone twice a day from the time of transfer. The second group received vaginal progesterone and also 0.1 mg diphereline on days 0, 3, and 6 of FET for LPS. Finally, the clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, and the implantation, and spontaneous abortion rates were compared in two groups. RESULTS: Results showed that there was no significant difference between the mean age of women and the duration of infertility (p = 0.78, p = 0.58, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in the terms of implantation and spontaneous abortion rates (p = 0.19, p = 0.31, respectively). However, in terms of clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, the significant differences were seen between groups (p = 0.008 and p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Co-administration of GnRH-a and vaginal progesterone in LPS may be superior to vaginal progesterone alone in women who underwent a frozen-selected embryo transfer cycle.
Full text 16,931 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 2 sections · click to expand

Section

Using GnRH-a + vaginal progesterone as opposed to vaginal progesterone alone for LPS after IVF may be the superior choice and lead to higher rate of CPR and ongoing pregnancy rate.

Coi Statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:33:14.624860+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0