Statistical methods in evaluating endometriosis studies.
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
Abstract
There is no shortage of statistical methods available for use in presenting the results of endometriosis research. Those that are currently in widest use have underlying statistical assumptions that may not be met by our study populations. Those methods that are more robust and compensate more for defects in satisfying these underlying assumptions are computer-based and much less "friendly" to physician and patient alike in terms of comprehensibility. Statisticians, with little appreciation for clinical practice, cannot answer these questions alone. Research is needed by clinician scientists comparing the validity of these methods of analysis.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (2)
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:12:15.619952+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK