Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system vs oral progestins for non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized trials

Hatem Abu Hashim, Essam Ghayaty, Mohamed El Rakhawy
In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2015 · vol. 213(4) , pp. 469–478 · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.037 · PMID:25797236 · W2078094549
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 12 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems with oral progestins for treating non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia in randomized trials.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

We sought to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with oral progestins for treatment of non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia (EH). Searches were conducted on PubMed, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL databases to August 2014, and reference lists of relevant articles were screened. The search was limited to articles conducted on human beings and females. The PRISMA Statement was followed. Seven randomized controlled trials (n = 766 women) were included. Main outcome measures were the therapeutic effect rate (histological response) after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of treatment; rate of irregular vaginal bleeding; and the hysterectomy rate per woman randomized. The Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool was used for quality assessment. Metaanalysis was performed with fixed effects model. LNG-IUS achieved a highly significant therapeutic response rate compared with oral progestins after 3 months of treatment (odds ratio [OR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-3.82; P = .001, 5 trials, I(2) = 0%, n = 376), after 6 months of treatment (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.84-5.45; P < .00001, 4 trials, I(2) = 0%, n = 397), after 12 months of treatment (OR, 5.73; 95% CI, 2.67-12.33; P < .00001, 2 trials, I(2) = 0%, n = 224), and after 24 months of treatment (OR, 7.46; 95% CI, 2.55-21.78; P = .0002, 1 trial, n = 104). Subgroup analysis showed evidence of highly significant therapeutic response following LNG-IUS compared with oral progestins for non-atypical simple as well as complex EH (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.14-5.53; P = .02, 6 trials, I(2) = 0%, n = 290; and OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.62-6.74; P = .001, 4 trials, I(2) = 0%, n = 216, respectively). Compared with oral progestins, LNG-IUS achieved significantly fewer hysterectomies (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15-0.45; P < .00001, 3 trials, n = 362, I² = 42%). No difference was observed in the rate of irregular vaginal bleeding between both groups (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.54-2.32; P = .76, 2 trials, n = 207, I² = 77%). Funnel plot analysis was not performed because of the relatively small number of included studies. For treatment of non-atypical EH, LNG-IUS achieves higher therapeutic effect rates and lower hysterectomy rates than oral progestins and should be offered as an alternative to oral progestins in these cases.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (43)

Cited by (13)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK