Options for hormone therapy in women who have had a hysterectomy
review
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
Post-hysterectomy hormone therapy for menopausal symptoms primarily requires estrogen alone, with progestogens only considered for specific conditions like endometriosis, as combined therapy offers no added symptom relief but increases breast cancer risk.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review postmenopausal hormone therapy for women who have undergone hysterectomy with or without bilateral oophorectomy and to make clinical recommendations regarding changes in regimens compared with those for women with their uterus in place. DESIGN: We conducted a literature review, including a review of current guidelines. RESULTS: When the uterus is absent, estrogen treatment is all that is needed when hot flashes and/or genital atrophic symptoms are associated with surgical or natural menopause. Reasons to add a progestogen to an estrogen-only therapy regimen after hysterectomy include the need to reduce the risk for unopposed estrogen-dependent conditions, chief among which are endometriosis or endometrial neoplasia. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that regimens containing both estrogen and progestogen versus estrogen alone are associated with a greater relative risk of breast cancer without additional improvement in relief of hot flashes or vaginal symptoms. When a bilateral oophorectomy is performed before natural menopause, the onset of menopausal symptoms, primarily vasomotor symptoms, genital tract atrophy, and/or a decline in sexual function, is rapid, and the symptoms are more severe. Thus, the need for a decision on the use of hormone therapy is accelerated. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to use or not use menopausal hormone therapy in women without a uterus should involve an individualized risk/benefit analysis just as it should when the uterus is present. After hysterectomy, for most patients, current literature results favor not including a progestogen. Data suggest an attenuation of the potential cardiovascular benefit of estrogen therapy in this situation, yet no better protection against bone fractures and an increase in the risk for breast cancer when both estrogen and progestogen are used.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (4)
- Endometriosis: harmful survival of an ectopic tissue 2006
- Medical Treatment of Endometriosis 1999
- Hysterectomy Rates for Benign Indications 2006
- Total and subtotal abdominal hysterectomy 2005
Cited by (2)
References (45)
- Endometriosis: harmful survival of an ectopic tissue via openalex
- Hysterectomy Rates for Benign Indications via openalex
- Medical Treatment of Endometriosis via openalex
- Total and subtotal abdominal hysterectomy via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70255-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e31803df49c via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e318032c505 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/jnci/92.4.328 via openalex
- doi:10.1258/1362180043654593 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000158103.27672.0d via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.gme.0000177709.65944.b0 via openalex
- doi:10.1385/endo:26:3:297 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1121 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.008 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e31803c56a4 via openalex
- W6674133312 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000178749.48793.7e via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0378-5122(02)00031-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14065-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.cco.0000174034.62032.08 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e31805170eb via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53823-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e31803167ab via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0039-128x(03)00123-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.056 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.gme.0000222475.93345.b3 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e318038d333 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.lgt.0000210128.93392.65 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.035 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14596-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.10.033 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e31804c793d via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0378-5122(94)00898-h via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00042192-199906010-00007 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03001-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.288.3.321 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/10532528.2003.10559812 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33850-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.010 via openalex
- doi:10.1055/s-2006-939565 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00001703-200402000-00013 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0008-6363(01)00466-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.gme.0000227401.98933.0b via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49598-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.291.14.1701 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-21T06:08:07.822426+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:15:24.675520+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:00.519696+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK