Use of adhesion prevention barriers in ovarian surgery, tuba I plasty, ectopic pregnancy, endometriosis, adhesiolysis, and myomectomy
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
Abstract
Intraperitoneal barriers reduce adhesion by preventing the formation of fibrin bridges between healing tissues. Although barriers were shown to be safe and effective in all human clinical trials, their use did not eliminate adhesions in all patients. Although barrier methods are the most effective technique for the prevention of adhesion reformation, efficacy of the barriers is limited to surgical situations where the area in question can be covered completely. Acceptance by physicians is constrained by technical difficulties including the need for hemostasis and removal of excess peritoneal fluid as well as concerns regarding fixation techniques and subsequent removal of the barrier.
Full text
1,027 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
EDITORIAL COMMENT: PDF Only
Use of adhesion prevention barriers in ovarian surgery, tuba I plasty, ectopic pregnancy, endometriosis, adhesiolysis, and myomectomy
- Gere S. diZerega
Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology 8(3):p 230-238, June 1996.
Intraperitoneal barriers reduce adhesion by preventing the formation of fibrin bridges between healing tissues. Although barriers were shown to be safe and effective in all human clinical trials, their use did not eliminate adhesions in all patients. Although barrier methods are the most effective technique for the prevention of adhesion reformation, efficacy of the barriers is limited to surgical situations where the area in question can be covered completely. Acceptance by physicians is constrained by technical difficulties including the need for hemostasis and removal of excess peritoneal fluid as well as concerns regarding fixation techniques and subsequent removal of the barrier.
Copyright © Copyright © 1996 YEAR Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (3)
Cited by (3)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-02T06:10:09.037253+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:02.671803+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK