Surgery versus non-surgical treatment for endometriosis-related pain during the COVID-19 pandemic

Ally Hui, Nyasha Gwata, Lufee Wong, Jim Tsaltas, Ben W. Mol
In: Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders · 2024 · vol. 8 , pp. 100084 · doi:10.1016/j.jeud.2024.100084 · W4399849486
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This study found no significant difference in pain reduction between surgical and non-surgical endometriosis treatments and stable quality of life for patients during COVID-19 pandemic disruptions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

There are no studies directly comparing medical vs surgical treatments in improving endometriosis-related pain despite the condition’s widespread prevalence. The COVID-19 pandemic restrictions resulted in many endometriosis patients unable to receive surgical treatment, providing an opportunity to compare non-surgical management directly against the conventional practice of surgery. We also explored the impact of the pandemic on the quality of care and quality of life for endometriosis patients. An online questionnaire was conducted between June and August 2023. Patients from a single centre were asked to participate if they had received surgery in 2018-2019 or received non-surgical management in 2020-2022. The questionnaire measured impacted endometriosis care, quality of life over the pre-, during, and post-pandemic periods with the endometriosis impact questionnaire (EIQ), and treatment effectiveness with the numerical rating scale (NRS). Of the 60 total respondents, 56.7% had a cancelled, postponed, or rescheduled clinic appointment, while 33.3% were impacted for endometriosis surgery and 8.3% for fertility treatment. There were no statistically significant differences in EIQ scores during or after the pandemic as compared to before and during for all domains. Both surgery and non-surgical treatment decreased NRS scores significantly by 3, p < 0.001. There was no significant difference between the two treatments, p = 0.901. The quality of life of endometriosis patients remained stable despite disruptions to care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both surgical and non-surgical treatments are effective for endometriosis-related pain, although how one compares to the other is still unclear due to systematic differences between study cohorts.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

NRS-pain

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (24)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK