Is endometriosis a progressive disease?
review
OA: closed
public-domain-us
Abstract
Whether endometriosis is a progressive disease remains debated. Central to this debate is understanding the natural history of endometriotic lesions, which are essentially wounds undergoing repeated tissue injury and repair. Viewing the disease through this lens, we reassess the literature on the progression, or absence thereof, of endometriosis and offer our perspective on this debate by delineating the aggravating and mitigating factors that influence lesional progression. We propose that the degree of lesional fibrosis, measurable via elastography as lesional stiffness, represents a promising marker for progression, as it correlates with aberrant histology, molecular alterations, symptom severity, clinical prognosis, and lesional mechanobiology. Lesional stiffness could aid in diagnosis, guide treatment choice, and predict outcomes, providing a valuable tool for managing endometriosis.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-12T06:13:51.797165+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-12T06:09:28.825150+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine