Adhesion formation of the parietal and visceral peritoneum: An explanation for the controversy on the use of autologous and alloplastic barriers?
review
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This paper examines the formation of adhesions between the parietal and visceral peritoneum, proposing it may explain the controversy surrounding autologous and alloplastic barrier use.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare formation of adhesions after injury to both parietal and visceral peritoneum and to determine the benefit of autologous transplants and alloplastic barriers in adhesion prevention.DesignExperimental prospective animal study and prospective randomized clinical study.SettingAn academic research environment.Patient(s)Forty women undergoing laparoscopy for endometriosis treatment.Intervention(s)In 60 rats, either the visceral or parietal peritoneum was injured and covered with autologous peritoneal transplants in half of the animals. The formation of adhesions was assessed 21 days postoperatively. In women, adhesions were evaluated 3 months after surgery with or without placement of alloplastic barriers on visceral lesions.Main outcome measure(s)Adhesions evaluated according to a scoring system.Result(s)Adhesions after injury of the visceral peritoneum in rats were significantly more severe than those from the parietal peritoneum. Autologous peritoneal transplants led to fewer adhesions especially after serosal injuries. Female volunteers treated with alloplastic barrier material showed less severe adhesions than the control group.Conclusion(s)The present data indicate that the potential to form adhesions is significantly higher in visceral than in parietal peritoneal lesions. The development of adhesions after injury to the visceral peritoneum could be reduced by a synthetic barrier material.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
Cited by (4)
- Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery 2015
- Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy 2021
- Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery 2020
- A novel nude mouse model for studying the pathogenesis of endometriosis 2022
References (29)
- Pathophysiology of pelvic adhesions. Modern trends in preventing infertility. via openalex
- W196912869 via openalex
- W1461310733 via openalex
- W1977418910 via openalex
- W2023154641 via openalex
- W2023660196 via openalex
- W2045847194 via openalex
- W2052367241 via openalex
- W2084494851 via openalex
- W2195926596 via openalex
- W2277523624 via openalex
- W2404427386 via openalex
- W2407216037 via openalex
- W2408768404 via openalex
- W2410046882 via openalex
- W2411349857 via openalex
- W2411589561 via openalex
- W2412341739 via openalex
- W2414495188 via openalex
- W2416687467 via openalex
- W2420158555 via openalex
- W2475306639 via openalex
- W4231784461 via openalex
- W4237500614 via openalex
- W4300876144 via openalex
- W6607996488 via openalex
- W6714106049 via openalex
- W24309181 via openalex
- W6715451366 via openalex
Cited by (4)
- A novel nude mouse model for studying the pathogenesis of endometriosis 2022
- Adhesion prevention after endometriosis surgery — results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial with second-look laparoscopy 2021
- Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery 2020
- Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery 2015
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-13T06:15:24.848197+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:46.468712+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK