Intro
Approximately, 239,000 new cases of ovarian cancer and 152,000 deaths due to this disease were reported worldwide ( 1 ). The frequency of clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is thought to be 5%-10% of all epithelial ovarian cancers in Western countries, but it is higher (>20%) in Japan. Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is resistant to platinum chemotherapy and it is characterized by poor prognosis. Therefore, novel strategy to overcome OCCC is required for a more effective outcome.
The transcription factor HNF1 homeobox β (HNF-1β) is upregulated in endometriosis and OCCC, suggesting that it might be a key molecule in endometriosis-associated CCC ( 2 ). We previously reported that HNF-1β promotes G2 phase cell cycle arrest and survival in human CCC cell lines through up-regulation of the phosphorylation of Chk1 (p-Chk1) protein in response to a genotoxic stress ( 3 ). Moreover, we reported that HNF-1β overexpressing cells survive by persistent Chk1 activation, facilitated by USP28-mediated Claspin stabilization ( 4 ). Therefore, therapy targeting the HNF-1β-USP28-Claspin pathway could be a novel targeted molecular therapy for HNF-1β overexpressing CCC. However, pharmacological inhibition of HNF-1β or Chk1 could cause several adverse effects, because they show comparable abundance in numerous organs such as the kidney, liver, pancreas, and digestive tract. While some study reported potential targets of HNF-1β ( 5 , 6 ), to further investigate the potential role of HNF-1β, we conducted small interfering RNA (siRNA) library screening, through which the effects of gene silencing on biological phenotypes can be systematically explored. Our results are expected to provide insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the HNF-1β-mediated cell survival in OCCC.
Results
The siRNA library screening was conducted by focusing on the cell survival rate among 169 cell cycle-related genes. We prepared HNF-1β knockdown and control cell line using TOV-21G (HNF-1β overexpressing OCCC cell line), and transfected siRNA library to both cell lines. Our hypothesis was as follows: if there would be a candidate gene related to HNF-1β signaling, the wild type cell line (with HNF-1β overexpression) would show low viability. TOV-21G si-control cell line showed significant reduced rate of cell survival compared with TOV-21G si-HNF-1β cells (46.31±8.60 vs. 100.00±5.82, P=0.001; Fig. 1 ). As a result, GSK-3β was extracted as the candidate gene. As each siRNA library consisted of four different sequences, we determined the most effective sequence (5'-GAAGUCAGCUAUACAGACA-3') by MTT assay.
To determine whether GSK-3β has a selective effect in cell lines with or without HNF-1β, we assessed the effect of GSK-3β RNA interference by MTT assay. In TOV-21G (HNF-1β overexpression), si-GSK-3β group showed significantly decreased cell proliferation at 48 and 72 h to si-control group (85.47±7.24 vs. 101.93±6.65, P=0.015; 76.03±7.02 vs. 93.79±11.29, P=0.009; respectively). In contrast, the si-GSK-3β in ES2 (HNF-1β negative) cells did not show differentiation neither at 48 and 72 h (101.61±4.44 vs. 100.79±3.09; 98.61±6.08 vs. 102.16±11.09) ( Fig. 2A ). To confirm the interference of GSK-3β, we further assessed the relative GSK-3β mRNA and protein expression levels between GSK-3β knockdown group and control group by RT-PCR and western blotting, respectively. As a result, GSK-3β knockdown group was confirmed to sufficiently suppress mRNA expression of GSK-3β ( Fig. 2B ), and protein levels of GSK-3β were also decreased in GSK-3β knockdown group compared to control group ( Fig. 2C and D ).
We assessed the effect of interference of GSK-3β on cell cycle and apoptosis in TOV-21G cells. Knockdown of GSK-3β resulted in sub-G1 phase accumulation and S phase reduction compared with the control group (10.84±1.66 vs. 3.60±0.45, P=0.002; 16.64±0.06 vs. 24.21±0.56, P<0.001, respectively) ( Fig 3A ). However, in the apoptosis assay, no significant difference was observed between the si-GSK-3β and control group ( Fig. 3B ).
Previous studies have shown that GSK-3β regulates serine 536 phosphorylation of NFκB subunit ( 9 , 10 ). We confirmed effective reduction of GSK-3β expression at 48 h and 72 h (0.60±0.043 vs. 1.00±0.11, P=0.004; 0.43±0.068 vs. 1.00±0.021, P<0.001, respectively). At 48 h after transfection of 5 nM si-GSK-3β, there was no significant reduction in the levels of phosphorylated NFκB subunit (p-NFκB) compared with the si-control group (0.97±0.11 vs. 1.00±0.15, P=0.801); however, at 72 h, a significant reduction of p-NFκB (0.64±0.015 vs. 1.00±0.034, P<0.001) was observed ( Fig. 4A ). To assess whether HNF-1β have an effect on GSK-3β protein expression and phosphorylation of NFκB subunit, we transfected 5 or 20 nM of si-HNF-1β or si-HNF-1β #2 into TOV-21G. At the lower concentration, si-HNF-1β #2 (5 nM) reduced phosphorylation of NFκB at 72 h (0.80±0.033 vs. 1.00±0.019, P=0.001). At the higher concentration of si-HNF-1β or si-HNF-1β #2 (20nM), the expression of GSK-3β at 72 h was significantly suppressed (0.63±0.13 vs. 1.00±0.14, P=0.029; 0.64±0.079 vs. 1.00±0.14, P=0.018, respectively), and phosphorylation of NFκB was significantly reduced at 48 h (0.29±0.18 vs. 1.00±0.25, P=0.015; 0.70±0.14 vs. 1.00±0.045, P=0.021, respectively) and 72 h (0.37±0.025 vs. 1.00±0.16, P=0.002, 0.59±0.035 vs. 1.00±0.074, P=0.001; respectively) compared with the control group ( Fig. 4B ). We investigated whether HNF-1β directly regulate GSK-3β messenger RNA, but HNF-1β does not promote production of GSK-3β mRNA ( Fig. 4C )
To investigate GSK-3β protein activity and stability, relative phosphorylation of GSK-3β (Ser 9) was assessed under lower and higher concentration of HNF-1β interference at 48 and 72 h. Under lower interference of HNF-1β, relative GSK-3β phosphorylation increased compared to si-control at 72 h (180.27±33.81 vs. 100.00±32.61, P=0.042). Under higher interference of HNF-1β, relative GSK-3β phosphorylation significantly decreased compared to si-control at both times (59.24±9.75 vs. 100.00±5.64, P=0.003; 69.08±4.92 vs. 100.00±9.17, P=0.049; Fig. 5A ). Furthermore, we assessed whether phosphorylated GSK-3β (Ser 9) distribution differ in the cytosol or nuclear under lower and higher HNF-1β interference. There were trends to decrease relative GSK-3β phosphorylation in cytosol and nuclear. Especially, under higher interference of HNF-1β at 72 h, significant reduction of relative GSK-3β phosphorylation was confirmed compared to si-control (85.65±3.17 vs. 100.00±2.91, P=0.004; Fig. 5B ).
To determine whether GSK-3β inhibitor AR-A014418 is cytotoxic to TOV-21G cells in vitro , cell proliferation was determined after exposure to AR-A014418 by the IncuCyte ZOOM™ Live-Cell Imaging system. TOV-21G cells were grown in 6-well dish (2.0x10 5 cells per well) treated by 42 µM bleomycin at 0 h. The AR-A014418 or vehicle group were measured confluence (%) every 3 h by IncuCyte Zoom ( Fig. 6A ). IncuCyte Zoom imaging suggested that TOV-21G cells treated by AR-A014418 lose its adherence or migration activity ( Fig. 6B ). We assessed whether GSK-3β act as a downstream target to promote Chk1 activation as phosphorylation. Protein expression of Chk1 and relative phosphorylation of Chk1 upon treatment of GSK-3β inhibitor after bleomycin stimulation were assessed. Although relative Chk1 phosphorylation showed no differentiation, protein expression of Chk1 decreased in inhibitor AR-A014418 group compared to vehicle group at 48 h (35.29±3.63 vs. 100.00±28.42, P=0.017; Fig. 6C ).
Cells were treated with two structurally distinct pharmacological inhibitors of GSK-3β (AR-A014418 and SB-216763) to determine whether GSK-3β is downstream of the HNF-1β signaling pathway by cell viability. Consistent with the western blotting result, lower knockdown of HNF-1β with a low siRNA concentration (5 nM) did not yield a significant difference between the si-HNF-1β and si-control groups. However, under higher concentration (20 nM), the knockdown of HNF-1β significantly rescued the effect of both inhibitors (applied at 40 µM) (72.43±5.69 vs. 39.53±2.86, P<0.001; 67.86±9.73 vs. 30.89±4.12, P<0.001, respectively) ( Fig. 7 ).
To determine whether the GSK-3β inhibitor shows a suppressive effect on tumor growth, we conducted an in vivo assay using a xenograft mouse model. To make murine subcutaneous tumors, 4.5x10 6 TOV-21G cells in 200 µl of PBS were injected subcutaneously into the neck of the dorsal midline in 5- to 6-week-old athymic nude mice (SLC). After tumor palpable point, the inhibitor (AR-A014418) and vehicle were administered intraperitoneally for 7 days. At the beginning and end of administration, mice weight did not show significant differentiation between inhibitor-treated group and vehicle group (15.99±1.30 vs. 16.54±2.10, P=0.632; 17.27±1.38 vs. 16.39±1.94, P=0.428, respectively). The inhibitor-treated group showed significantly decreased tumor growth compared with the control group (194.48±70.28 vs. 398.30±157.80, P=0.042; Fig. 8 ).
Discussion
A high concentration of free iron due to repeated hemorrhage and inflammation is frequently detected in ovarian endometriotic cysts; this condition leads to carcinogenesis through iron-induced persistent oxidative stress and DNA damage ( 11-13 ). Interestingly, iron-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling promotes survival of endometriotic cell, possibly by activating the detoxification and anti-apoptotic pathways via overexpression of HNF-1β ( 3 , 4 , 14 , 15 ). Given that some ROS act as a messenger in the TNF-α and okadaic acid-induced post-translational activation of NFκB/p65( 16 ), it is suggested that the persistent oxidative stress in endometriotic cysts may serve as an activator of NFκB signaling and HNF-1β expression.
Our previous study showed that HNF-1β is overexpressed in OCCC ( 3 ). This transcription factor is associated with cell survival and cell cycle arrest at the G2 phase, concomitant with accumulation of p-Chk1, a key regulator of the cell cycle arrest after a genotoxic stress ( 3 ). We further identified an ubiquitin hydrolase, USP28, as a candidate downstream target of HNF-1β and as a stabilizer of Claspin protein, which is a binding partner of Chk1. Taken together, HNF-1β regulates Claspin protein stability and Chk1 protein activation, leading to the G2 cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage, by controlling the USP28-dependent ubiquitin-proteasome pathway ( 4 ).
In the current study, we identified GSK-3β as a key gene in HNF-1β overexpressing OCCC. Among several candidate genes, GSK-3β was chosen to be a desirable target by following reasons: i) small molecular inhibitor targeted HNF-1β is not exist. ii) GSK-3β is reported not only to play an important role in cancer progression, but also associated with several neuro degenerative disease, including Parkinson's disease ( 5 ), Alzheimer's disease ( 17-21 ), Huntington's disease ( 22 ). Moreover in the several clinical trials using GSK-3β inhibitor targeted Alzheimer's disease, advanced solid tumors and acute myelogenous leukemia inhibitors of GSK-3β revealed its safety ( 23-25 ). GSK-3β has been previously reported to play an essential role in maintaining constitutive NFκB reporter activity and expression of NFκB target genes in pancreatic cancer cells ( 10 ). Moreover, the two GSK-3β isoforms function to regulate constitutive NFκB activity in Panc-1 and MiaPaCa-2 cells ( 9 ). We confirmed that GSK-3β activates NFκB by phosphorylating it in the TOV-21G OCCC cell line. We further showed that GSK-3β is a downstream target of HNF-1β based on the following three observations: i) the effect of GSK-3β interference on cell proliferation was observed only in the background of HNF-1β overexpression. ii) Based on our western blotting analysis, HNF-1β could regulate both the expression of GSK-3β and phosphorylation of NFκB. iii) Strong silencing of HNF-1β increased the IC 50 of two structurally distinct pharmacological inhibitors of GSK-3β (AR-A014418 and SB-216763). Together, these results support that GSK-3β is a candidate downstream target of HNF-1β.
Previous study reported that NFκB modulates transcriptional upregulation of HNF-1β through alteration in bcl-2 expression ( 26 ). In the current study, the stronger silencing of HNF-1β resulted in a more dramatic change in the phosphorylation of NFκB rather than in the protein expression NF-κB. This suggests that the role of GSK-3β is mainly to phosphorylate NFκB to activate downstream signaling. To our best knowledge, there are no reports regarding auto phosphorylation of NFκB, suggesting that GSK-3β might be crucial for activation of NFκB.
Our study has some limitations. Firstly, we evaluated the effectiveness of GSK-3β inhibition only using two types of OCCC cell lines, namely TOV-21G (HNF-1β overexpression) and ES2 (HNF-1β negative). To validate these results and identify more specific effects on HNF-1β overexpression, further studies should be conducted using knocking or knockout HNF-1β cell lines. Secondly, because HNF-1β does not promote production of GSK-3β mRNA ( Fig. 4C ), there could be involvement of some kind of proteasome degradation-related protein, such as members of the USP family, as identified in our previous study. Therefore, to investigate the detailed mechanism, further screening focusing on the USP family is needed.
In conclusion, this study showed for the first time that GSK-3β is a target gene of HNF-1β. In addition, our findings reveal the novel pathway of HNF-1β-GSK-3β-p-NFκB axis in response to DNA damage. Targeting this pathway may represent a putative, novel, anticancer strategy in OCCC.
Materials|Methods
All cells were maintained in humidified incubator at 37˚C with 5% CO 2 . These cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 with L-Glutamine and Phenol Red containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 U/ml penicillin and streptomycin, and used at sub confluent status. TOV-21G and ES2 cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection. Among these CCC lines, TOV-21G shows HNF-1β overexpression, while ES2 is negative for HNF-1β expression.
We carried out siRNA library screening of human cell cycle regulation-related genes (G-003205; Dharmacon). TOV-21G cell line was grown in 6-well plate at a concentration of 4.0x10 5 cells per well and si-HNF-1β (M-007921-01; Dharmacon) or si-control (D-001210-02; Dharmacon) was reverse transfected rapidly at 5 nM according to manufacturer's recommended protocol. At 24 h after transfection, HNF-1β knockdown and control cells were plated in three wells of 96-well plate, respectively, at a concentration of 5,000 cells per well. In each of the three wells of HNF-1β knockdown and control cells, we transfected 5 nM of siRNAs for screening. After 48 h, we measured cell viability by MTT assay (Cell Proliferation kit I; Roche) according to the recommended protocol. For each 96-well plate, we transfected si-control as negative control, and si-PLK1 (M-003290-01; Dharmacon) as positive control. Candidates were extracted as follows. Firstly, difference in cell viability between TOV-21G (si-control) and TOV-21G (si-HNF-1β) was considered to be an effect of HNF-1β interference on cells. Secondly, the cell viability of negative control group was verified to show normal distribution, and we corrected the test results based on difference with negative control.
TOV-21G and ES2 cells were grown in 6-well dish (4.0x10 5 cells per well) and si-glycogen synthase kinase-3β (si-GSK-3β; D-003010-09; Dharmacon) and si-control were reverse transfected at 5 nM according to manufacturer's recommended protocol. TOV-21G cells were grown in 6-well dish (2.0x10 5 cells per well) and si-GSK-3β, si-HNF-1β (M-007921-01 or D-009721-02; Dharmacon) and si-control were reverse transfected at 5 or 20 nM according to manufacturer's recommended protocol. Then, we extracted protein at 48 and 72 h after transfection. Samples were applied to Mini-PROTEAN ® TGX™ Gels 4-15%, and transferred by Trans-Blot ® Turbo™ Transfer Pack (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Protein extraction from nuclear and cytoplasma separately were conducted using NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction reagents (78833; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to manufacturer's recommended protocol. The following antibodies were used for western blotting: primary antibodies against HNF-1β (ab187744, diluted 1:10,000; Abcam), GSK-3β (#12456, diluted 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), phospho-GSK-3α/β (#9331, diluted 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), NFκB (#8242, diluted 1:1,000, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), phospho-NFκB (#3033, diluted 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), phospho-Chk1 (#2349, diluted 1:10,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and actin (sc-8432, diluted 1:5,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies against mouse (sc-2005, 1:10,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and rabbit (sc-2004, diluted 1:10,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) were used.
RNA extraction from TOV-21G and ES2 cells were performed at 24 and 48 h after transfection (5 nM) by Taq Man Gene Expression Cells-to-CT™ kit (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. PCR was performed on StepOnePlus™ Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with 4 µl of cDNA, 10 µl of TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix (4369016; Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 1 µl of GSK-3β or GAPDH TaqMan Gene Expression Assay (Hs01047719_m1 or Hs99999905_m1; Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 5 µl of nuclease-free water (B-003000-WB-100; Dharmacon) by 2 -∆∆Cq method ( 7 ).
TOV-21G cells were grown in 6-well dish (2.0x10 5 cells per well) and si-GSK-3β and si-control were reverse transfected at 5 nM according to manufacturer's recommended protocol. Then, the cells were harvested for 48 h and washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before fixation in cold 70% ethanol which were added drop wise to the pellet while vortexing. Cells were fixed for 30 min at 4˚C. Fixed cells were washed twice in PBS and centrifuged by 3,000 x g for 5 min. Cells were incubated with 950 µl from 10 mg/ml of a ribonuclease (313-01461; Nippon Gene Co., Ltd) and 50 µl from 1 mg/ml of a propidium iodide (P378; Dojindo Laboratories). A BD FACSCalibur™ (BD Biosciences) flow cytometer was used to analyze the cell population for cell cycle changes.
TOV-21G cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a concentration of 2.0x10 5 cells per well and the cells were then treated with si-GSK-3β and si-control. Harvest the cells after the incubation period for 48 h and wash in cold PBS. Re-centrifuge the washed cells, discard the supernatant and resuspend the cells in 1X Annexin-binding buffer (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Determine the cell density and dilute in 1X Annexin-binding buffer to 1.0x10 5 cells/100 µl. Add 5 µl Alexa Fluor ® 488 Annexin V (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and propidium iodide to adjust its final concentration as 2.5 µg/ml. Incubate the cells at room temperature for 15 min. After the incubation period, add 400 µl of 1X Annexin-binding buffer, mix gently and keep the samples on ice. As soon as possible, analyze the stained cells by BD FACSCalibur™ to assess the percentage changes in early and late apoptosis.
Cell proliferation was studied using the IncuCyte ZOOM™ Live-Cell Imaging system (Essen BioScience) as previously described for kinetic monitoring of proliferation and cytotoxicity of cultured cells ( 8 ). IncuCyte image assays quantify how rapidly the proportion of the area covered by cells increases with time as a function of cell proliferation rate ( 8 ). TOV-21G cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a concentration of 2.0x10 5 cells per well and all cells were then treated by 42 µM bleomycin at 0 h. The AR-A014418 (20 µM) or vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide) group were transferred to the IncuCyte ZOOM™ apparatus, and incubations continued over 72 h, with images collected every three hours. All images were analyzed focused on confluence (%).
All animal experiments were conducted according to Guidelines for Proper Conduct of Animal Experiments (June 1, 2006; Science Council of Japan). And this study was approved by the animal ethics committee of Nara Medical University (reference no. 12594). To generate murine subcutaneous tumors, 4.5x10 6 TOV-21G cells in 200 µl of PBS were injected subcutaneously into the neck of the dorsal midline in 5- to 6-week-old athymic nude mice (SLC) under maintenance of 2% after 5% introduction of inhaled isoflurane (Pfizer Inc.). Ten days after the injection, from the point of tumor palpable, we separated the mice into two groups: inhibitor group and control group (n=5 for each), and intraperitoneally injected AR-A014418 (S7435; Shelleck Chemicals) at a dose of 1 mg/kg or PBS with the same amount of dimethyl sulfoxide every day for one week. Physical method (cervical dislocation) was applied to conduct sacrifice of the mice.
Data were assessed whether they present normal distribution by Shapiro-Wilk analysis. In normal distribution, t-test was applied and presented as mean ± SD. In case of variables that did not present normal distribution, Mann-Whitney U test were applied and expressed as median ± SD. Analyses were performed by SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp.). All statistical analysis was performed at least twice. Two-sided P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.