Intracorporeal Electromechanical Tissue Morcellation

Kimberly A Kho, Ted L Anderson, Ceana H Nezhat, Ceana Nezhat
Obstetrics and gynecology · 2014 · vol. 124(4) , pp. 787–793 · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000448 · PMID:25198260 · PMC4377220 · W2313764144
review OA: green CC0 ⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This paper reviews electromechanical morcellation risks, including tissue dissemination and iatrogenic injuries, and discusses safer alternatives and improved instrumentation.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Electromechanical morcellators have come under scrutiny with concerns about complications involving iatrogenic dissemination of both benign and malignant tissues. Although the rapidly rotating blade has resulted in morcellator-related vascular and visceral injuries, equally concerning are the multiple reports in the literature demonstrating seeding of the abdominal cavity with tissue fragmented such as leiomyomas, endometriosis, adenomyosis, splenic and ovarian tissues, and occult cancers of the ovaries and uterus. Alternatives to intracorporeal electric morcellation for tissue extirpation through the vagina and through minilaparotomy are feasible, safe, and have been shown to have comparable, if not superior, outcomes without an increased need for laparotomy. Intracorporeal morcellation within a containment bag is another option to minimize the risk of iatrogenic tissue seeding. Patient safety is a priority with balanced goals of maximizing benefits and minimizing harm. When intracorporeal electromechanical morcellation is planned, physicians should discuss the risks and consequences with their patients. Although data are being collected to quantify and understand these risks more clearly, a minimally invasive alternative to unenclosed intracorporeal morcellation is favored when available. It is incumbent on surgeons to communicate the risks of practices and devices and to advocate for continued improvement in surgical instrumentation and techniques.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisadenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Catheter Ablation Genital Neoplasms, Female Intraoperative Complications Practice Guidelines as Topic Catheter Ablation Catheter Ablation Equipment Design Equipment Safety Female Genital Neoplasms, Female Genital Neoplasms, Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans Intraoperative Complications Intraoperative Complications Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (73)

Cited by (5)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:15.805398+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK