Medical students' perceptions towards distance e-Learning in gynecology ward during the COVID-19 pandemic

other OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This study evaluated medical students' perceptions of distance e-learning in gynecology during COVID-19, finding that while mobile devices and home-based learning were preferred, students felt it was not ideal for basic or practical clinical skills.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This cross-sectional survey studied medical students’ perceptions of distance e-learning (DEL) for clinical teaching in the gynecology ward during the COVID-19 pandemic at Iran University of Medical Sciences, using a self-administered 30-item Likert-scale questionnaire administered online to 130 fifth- and sixth-year students (September 2020–September 2021). Students reported both positive and negative aspects of DEL, with some viewing it as helpful for covering practical topics and enabling discussion, teamwork, and reflection, while others perceived it as inappropriate for learning basic skills and effectively practicing clinical skills, and expressed concerns about instructor readiness and infrastructure/internet-related issues. The authors highlight a key limitation that the study’s small sample size means findings may not be transferable to other contexts and should be interpreted with caution. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused serious public health problems and compromised the health of individuals and communities. This study aimed to evaluate a Distance e-Learning from the perspective of medical students in the Gynecology ward during the COVID-19 Pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Iran University of Medical from the September 2020 to September 2021. The study sample included 130 medical students who participated in distance training courses in the gynecology ward during the COVID-19 pandemic. All medical students were included for the study. Medical students (externs and interns), who received Distance eLearning in the gynecology ward during the study, were included. The self-administered questionnaire was used in this study. Questionnaires was developed through literature review and consultation with gynecology and eLearning experts. Face and content validity was established by eight experts. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 170 medical students. Of the 130 respondents 65% were female and 35% were male. There were 57 (43.8%) externs and 73 (56.2) interns. Most students agreed that mobile devices increase their learning and home is the preferred place for participation in DE. Most students (66.9%) either strongly disagreed or disagreed that Distance e-Learning was an appropriate method for learning basic clinical skills.72.3% of respondents strongly disagreed or disagreed that Distance e-Learning provided them an opportunity to practice clinical skills effectively. Most medical students (69.3%) strongly agreed or agreed that Distance e-Learning created more opportunities to apply theoretical knowledge directly to medical practice. DISCUSSION: The results of the online survey suggest that medical students have found both positive and negative aspects of clinical learning by DEL format in Gynecology ward.
Full text 10,827 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 5 sections · click to expand

Intro

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused serious public health problems and compromised the health of individuals and communities [ 1 ]. The spread of the COVID-19 virus across the world has affected the educational systems worldwide, including in Iran. The closure of educational institutions have created numerous challenges for medical students and teachers [ 2 ]. In response to the COVID-19 situation, the Association of American Medical Colleges made an announcement on March 17, 2020, and issued guidelines for medical schools to pause clinical rotations [ 3 ]. The National COVID-19 Administration in Iran also announced an emergency state [ 4 ]. Hence, all medical schools were forced to search for creative techniques to foster clinical medical education. Distance e-Learning (DEL) emerged as the method of teaching to maintain the continuity of education during the pandemic [ 5 ]. DEL is defined as “using computer technology to deliver training, including technology-supported learning online, offline, or both” [ 6 ]. This shift was considered the best solution to clinical education problems in the era of COVID-19. The effectiveness of DEL amidst the COVID-19 crisis‏ has been investigated in several studies [ 5 , 7 , 8 ]. A survey by Al-Balas et al. showed that distance learning was the best solution to maintain clinical learning processes in emergency situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic [ 6 ]. In Iran’s medical education field, eLearning was not considered a new phenomenon in teaching medical students. The pandemic forced the use of virtual teaching and learning processes to complete the syllabus within the time frame. The Universities in Iran has implemented several technological tools to secure the remote clinical teaching process. Training sessions took place both for medical students and clinical teachers to learn how to interact via specific platforms, such as Adobe Connect, Skyroom, and Big Blue Button software. Nevertheless, the characterization of this format of teaching is perceived to be more difficult compared to face-to-face teaching for medical students [ 9 , 10 ]. In this regard, it is crucial to evaluate the perception of medical students on DEL approaches in the COVID-19 pandemic. This research focuses on the experience of DEL in clinical teaching at the Iran University of Medical Sciences from medical students’ viewpoints. This study aims to explore medical students’ perspectives on DEL in the Gynecology Ward during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

The questionnaire was sent to 170 medical students. Of the 130 respondents 65% were female and 35% were male. There were 57 (43.8%) externs and 73 (56.2) interns. Preferred devices and locations for participation in Distance E-learning Courses is shown in Table 1 . Table 2 shows the frequency distribution of respondents regarding medical students’ perceptions of DEL in the Gynecology ward during the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Conclusions

Medical students had different opinion about importance and application of the distance eLearning in clinical education. Some of them believed that this method was a good tool that helped them in their coverage of most of the practical topics required in the Gynecology ward and their teachers had enough skills and experience to teach theoretical subjects virtually and this method provided an opportunity for discussion, teamwork and reflection for them. On the one hand, participants were not believed Distance E-Learning was an appropriate method for learning basic skills and practicing clinical skills effectively. Faculty development of medical teachers in online teaching methods also need to be considered. The results of this study have implications for policy and practice with regard to distance eLearning clinical education training in Iran.

Materials|Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Iran University of Medical Sciences from September 2020 to September 2021. The study sample included 130 medical students, in the fifth and sixth year of Medicine who participated in distance training courses in the gynecology ward during the COVID-19 pandemic. All medical students were included for the study. A self-administered questionnaire was used in this study. Questionnaires were developed through literature review and consultation with gynecology and eLearning experts. Face and content validity was measured using qualitative methods. To measure face validity, 5 expert were selected and asked to check the questionnaire items respecting simplicity and clarity. The same experts are asked to examine the content validity of items with respect to relevance and representativeness. In this process, some items were added, deleted, and revised. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha (0.83). The Thirty-item questionnaire consisted of six factors: (Demographic data, preferred eLearning tools and location for use, theoretical education, practical skills education, and instructor and infrastructure using a five-point Likert scale ("strongly agree," "agree," "no idea," "disagree," and "strongly disagree"). The research objectives were explained to the participants before the study. In addition, written informed consent was obtained. An online questionnaire was provided using Porsline software in the Persian language. Microsoft office excel software used for the data analysis. The result of the study was analyzed by using descriptive statistics such as frequency distribution and percentage. The link to the questionnaire was forwarded to the students by email. The Broadband internet connections were available to a much wider group of medical student who has participated in this study. Internet access for those who lack home broadband internet, were mobile access via their smartphones. Some medical students turn to public internet use (hospital or library) to participate in online class. Broadband internet connections were available to the instructors also (gynecology faculties). They broadcasted from their homes or the hospital. Remote online classes were held synchronously via Adobe Connect, Skyroom, and Big Blue Button software and recordings were accessible afterwards. Online teaching was planned according to the educational calendar. We used some strategies for engaging medical student during online classes such as using online group debate that promotes individual and group reflections in class, watching interactive videos, using a quiz during a synchronous learning activity, setting collaborative group tasks and opening student and teacher webcams. The ethics committee approved this study at the Iran University of Medical Sciences (code: IR.IUMS.REC.1400.208).

Supplementary Material

(SAV) Click here for additional data file.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

MeSH descriptors

Computer-Assisted Instruction Computer-Assisted Instruction Computer-Assisted Instruction Computer-Assisted Instruction Computer-Assisted Instruction Computer-Assisted Instruction Computer-Assisted Instruction Computer-Assisted Instruction Computer-Assisted Instruction Computer-Assisted Instruction COVID-19 COVID-19 COVID-19 COVID-19 COVID-19 COVID-19 COVID-19 COVID-19 COVID-19 COVID-19

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-26T00:33:57.721315+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-15T02:00:00.661756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine